CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 24 mars 2022
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-217017
- Date
- 24 mars 2022
- Publication
- 24 mars 2022
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 11 April 2022   SECOND SECTION Application no. 35303/15 INTERACTIV S.A. against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 7 July 2015 communicated on 24 March 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns alleged unfairness of civil proceedings. The applicant company was successful at first and second instances. However, the two judgments were reversed by the Supreme Court of Justice in the absence of an oral hearing and without the applicant having a chance to present its case or to comment on new evidence presented by the opposite party and accepted by the Supreme Court. The applicant complains that the proceedings were not fair because the Supreme Court of Justice acted as a first instance court but without conducting a proper hearing. It also complains that the outcome of the proceedings amounted to a breach of its rights under Article 1 of Protocol   No.   1 to the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of its civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article   6 §   1 of the Convention ( Covalenco v. the Republic of Moldova , no. 72164/14, § 25, 16 June 2020)?   2.     Has there been a breach of the applicant’s right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1?   The Government are requested to submit a full copy of the case-file in the domestic proceedings.Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 24 mars 2022
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-217017
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel