CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 18 août 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s25D5DE94 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sEDC5336B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:12pt } .sA101A847 { font-family:Arial; font-size:11pt; font-weight:bold } Published on 6 September 2021   SECOND SECTION Application no. 8057/19 Azize SEYİTVAN against Turkey and 6 other applications (see list appended) communicated on 18 August 2021   SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The cases concern the termination of the applicants’ employment contracts on account of the alleged existence of links with a terrorist organisation on the basis of the simplified dismissal procedure as set out in the emergency legislative decree no. 667 . The cases raise issues similar to those examined in Pişkin v. Turkey (no. 33399/18, §§ 129-153 and §§   167 ‑ 229, 15 December 2020).   The applicants complain that their right to a fair trial, including their right to an effective examination of their case, were breached before the domestic courts. The applicants in applications nos. 8057/19, 8467/19, 9041/19, 24205/19 and 27855/20 further complain under Article 8 of the Convention of the detrimental consequences of the dismissal on their reputation and their private lives.   QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     In the light of the principles set out in Pişkin v. Turkey (cited above, §§   120 ‑ 153), did the domestic courts carry out an effective judicial review of the applicants’ dismissals in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?   2.     Has there been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention in respect of the applicants in application nos. 8057/19, 8467/19, 9041/19, 24205/19 and   27855/20 (see, Pişkin , cited above, §§ 211-229)? APPENDIX List of applications   No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality Represented by 1. 8057/19 Seyitvan v. Turkey 29/01/2019 Azize SEYİTVAN 1981 Diyarbakır Turkish Mervan Eren GÜL 2. 8467/19 Ateş v. Turkey 29/01/2019 Ali ATEŞ 1990 Diyarbakır Turkish Mervan Eren GÜL 3. 9041/19 Akyürek v. Turkey 29/01/2019 Şengül AKYÜREK 1994 Diyarbakır Turkish Mervan Eren GÜL 4. 24205/19 İnci v. Turkey 29/01/2019 İsmet İNCİ 1966 Diyarbakır Turkish Mervan Eren GÜL 5. 2605/20 Serttaş v. Turkey 06/12/2019 Mücahit SERTTAŞ 1966 Van Turkish Ümit AVCI 6. 27855/20 Karatekin v. Turkey 28/05/2020 Ayhan KARATEKİN 1983 Diyarbakır Turkish Mervan Eren GÜL 7. 35786/20 Eruslu v. Turkey 06/08/2020 Ahmet Burak ERUSLU 1988 Istanbul Turkish Bilge Hilal BİLGİN