CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 9 juin 2021

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s8A75A232 { font-weight:bold; color:#000000 } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sCA1BE78A { height:16.6pt } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s633BEE48 { font-weight:bold; color:#201f1e } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s798B568D { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .sC6F37A61 { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .s1C93675A { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .sB9C2D5DC { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .s60926251 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .sB9AE580D { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .s6A659972 { color:#201f1e } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s98C4193C { text-decoration:underline; color:#201f1e } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCEF2C954 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)109 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Twenty-six cases against Turkey   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 9 June 2021 at the 1406 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 64138/11 POLAT 07/05/2019 07/05/2019 53319/10 UÇAR 05/03/2019 05/03/2019 69448/10 DAĞTEKİN 28/05/2019 28/05/2019 33513/11 DAĞTEKİN 28/05/2019 28/05/2019 73487/12 TAŞ ÇAKAR 28/05/2019 28/05/2019 73954/11 KILINÇ 02/07/2019 02/07/2019 35575/12 ETE 03/09/2019 03/09/2019 66575/12 YILDIZ 03/09/2019 03/09/2019 62928/12 ARAMAZ 01/10/2019 01/10/2019 54093/10 ALTUN AND OTHERS 10/07/2018 10/07/2018 47455/10 ABAY 04/02/2020 04/02/2020 47884/10 BAYDEMİR 15/01/2019 15/01/2019 73783/11 BAKIRHAN 17/03/2020 17/03/2020 9662/10 YURTDAŞ AND SÖYLEMEZ 19/11/2019 19/11/2019 69604/12+ YAMAÇ 01/10/2019 01/10/2019 74054/11 YILDIRIM 25/09/2018 25/09/2018 54698/13 KALKAN 01/10/2019 01/10/2019 21196/12 KALKAN 01/10/2019 01/10/2019 63681/12 AKYÜZ 07/05/2019 07/05/2019 22112/12 AKTAŞ AND OTHERS 01/10/2019 01/10/2019 27167/12 ZÜMRÜT 17/03/2020 17/03/2020 30905/09 ALİ ÇETİN 20/06/2017 20/09/2017 44982/07 ONAL No. 2 02/07/2019 02/10/2019 29680/05 DİLİPAK 15/09/2015 02/05/2016 871/08 ÖZER No. 2 26/01/2010 26/04/2010 37721/97 ERKANLI 13/02/2003 Friendly settlement   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”,   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the authorities’ unjustified interference with the applicants’ right to freedom of expression due to the criminal proceedings initiated under various articles of the Criminal Code of Anti-Terrorism Law (violations of Article 10 and in some of the cases also of Article 5);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2021)379 )   Considering that the question of individual measures was therefore resolved, given, inter alia , that the domestic proceedings have been reopened and the applicants have been acquitted or they have not asked for the reopening of the proceedings or the charges have been dropped or the proceedings became time-barred; and none of them is still detained on account of those proceedings;   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Öner and Türk (51962/12), Altuğ Taner Akcam (27520/07), Nedim Şener (38270/11) and Artun and Guvener (75510/01) groups of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.