CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 16 avril 2021

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Published on 26 April 2021   THIRD SECTION Application no. 4743/21 Aleksey Anatolyevich NAVALNYY against Russia lodged on 20 January 2021 communicated on 16 and 23 April 2021   The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC   QUESTION In view of the allegation concerning the restrictions on the applicant’s communication with his   lawyers, including the lack of confidentiality, has there been any hindrance by the State in the present case with the effective exercise of the applicant’s   right of application, ensured by Article 34 of the Convention (see Cebotari v.   Moldova , no.   35615/06, §§ 58-68, 13   November 2007)?