CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 18 mars 2021
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-209214
- Date
- 18 mars 2021
- Publication
- 18 mars 2021
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s335E46F { width:8.92%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s1A722788 { width:31.82%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s668B4E1 { width:23.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sBFCD8A20 { width:17.34%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s72F4128A { width:18.52%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sD82CE2D9 { width:8.92%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s56F01CFF { width:31.82%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s330795EF { width:23.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s7948C2AE { width:17.34%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sE1E810D7 { width:18.52%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Published on 6 April 2021   FIRST SECTION Application no. 44758/20 Athanasios PANAYOTOPOULOS and Others against Greece lodged on 30 September 2020 communicated on 18 March 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicants, three Greek nationals belonging to the Roma ethnic group, allege that they were subjected to acts of police brutality amounting to ill-treatment and/or torture during their arrest, transfer to and detention at the police station. They also complain that the competent authorities failed to carry out an adequate investigation into the incident and that the impugned events were motivated by racial prejudice. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Were the applicants subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention as a result of the police officers’ acts that took place during the applicants’ arrest, transfer to and detention at the police station on 8   October   2016?   2.     Given the applicants’ Roma origin, did the treatment complained of demonstrate discrimination on the part of the State agents and was, in consequence, in violation of Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 3 of the Convention?   3.     Did the authorities conduct an effective and prompt investigation into the applicants’ allegations, as required under the procedural head of Article   3 of the Convention? Have the authorities failed in their duty to investigate possible racist motives for the acts complained of, in violation of Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 3 in its procedural aspect?   4.     The respondent Government are requested to submit the documents relating to the administrative investigation.   APPENDIX     No. Applicant’s Name Year of birth /registration Nationality Place of residence 1. Athanasios PANAYOTOPOULOS 1984 Greek Aspropyrgos 2. Ioannis BEKOS 1989 Greek Aspropyrgos 3. Vasilios LOUKAS 1995 Greek Corinth  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 18 mars 2021
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-209214
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel