CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 11 mars 2021

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4CDBBA1E { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .sB7FB9D9B { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s70B41AB9 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s790D6B17 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s256014D3 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s309031D4 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCEF2C954 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)49 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 15 cases against Ukraine   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 March 2021 at the 1398 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 71186/01 FUKLEV 07/06/2005 30/11/2005 10398/04 GOGIN 11/12/2008 11/03/2009 10911/05 IVAN PANCHENKO 10/12/2009 10/03/2010 22215/04 IVASHCHENKO 14/12/2006 14/03/2007 40753/07 KOMNATSKYY 15/10/2009 15/01/2010 9089/04 KONTSEVYCH 16/02/2012 16/05/2012 27349/03 KOZHANOVA 22/11/2005 22/02/2006 42478/04 MIRVODA 07/12/2006 07/03/2007 20397/07 PYSARSKYY AND OTHERS 20/06/2013 20/06/2013 7158/04 ROBOTA AND OTHERS 17/01/2013 17/01/2013 16267/04 SUKHOPAR 11/01/2007 11/04/2007 19430/06 TERNOVIK AND OTHERS 11/04/2013 11/04/2013 31387/05 VASILCHUK 10/12/2009 10/05/2010 34000/07 VINNIYCHUK 20/10/2016 20/01/2017 14077/05 YANGOLENKO 10/12/2009 10/05/2010   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions, mostly delivered against entities owned or controlled by the State, and to the lack of an effective remedy in this respect,   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see Annex I to the document DH-DD(2019)914-add );   Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved in these cases, given that the domestic judicial decisions at issue were enforced either before or after the date of the European Court’s judgments;   Recalling also that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov / Zhovner and Burmych and Others group of cases which remain under the supervision of the Committee, and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in the cases listed below as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of thereof.