CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 11 mars 2021

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s6AE8D4B6 { font-family:Arial; font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF0962A62 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt; font-size:10pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s3139AACB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s8DE33171 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .s2EAAAA4F { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)36 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Nine cases against the Russian Federation   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 11 March 2021 at the 1398 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 62812/12 BULAVA 25/07/2017 25/07/2017 40044/12 DMITRIYEV 24/10/2013 24/10/2013 2961/09 DUMIKYAN 13/12/2016 13/03/2017 48562/06 KULIKOV 27/11/2012 27/02/2013 752/15 MUMZHIYEV 24/11/2016 24/11/2016 12983/14 PATRANIN 23/07/2015 14/12/2015 43589/02 SALAKHUTDINOV 11/02/2010 11/05/2010 3130/03 SUDARKOV 10/07/2008 01/12/2008 42147/05 URAZOV 14/06/2016 17/10/2016   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established mainly on account of poor conditions of detention in the detention facilities under the authority of the Ministry of Justice, the lack of adequate medical care and the lack of an effective domestic remedy in both respects (violations of Articles 3 and 13);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court;   Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved, given that the applicants have been released, and that all necessary individual measures have also been taken in respect of the other violations found by the Court;   Recalling that the question of the general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Kalashnikov group (Application No. 47095/99) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures in relation to poor conditions of detention and the lack of effective domestic remedies;   Recalling also that the general measures required in response to the other violations found in some of these cases are or were examined by the Committee in the cases or groups of Klyakhin , Kamaliyevy , Tomov and Others , Svinarenko and Slyadnev and Kovalev ;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.