CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 3 février 2021

.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s6AE8D4B6 { font-family:Arial; font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3139AACB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sD6ABE070 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:35.4pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2021)22 Execution of the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights 13 cases against Turkey   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 3 February 2021 at the 1394 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Date of the decision 22199/10 Kerima ACAR AND OTHERS 30/04/2020 3744/10 Abdurrahman AĞAMOLLA 03/03/2020 15048/11 Gürbüz ALTINEL 14/01/2020 43186/17+ Ünal ÇAKAR AND 20 OTHER APPLICATIONS 14/05/2020 38927/06 EK-İL İNŞAAT TAAHHÜT TİCARET VE SANAYİ ANONİM ŞİRKETİ AND Ekrem EKŞİ 30/04/2020 38599/10 EKSİM YATIRIM HOLDİNG ANONİM ŞİRKETİ 19/03/2020 428/10 Fahri ERASLAN AND 15 OTHER APPLICATIONS 10/12/2019 41171/17 Recep KARA AND OTHERS AND 2 OTHER APPLICATIONS 19/03/2020 7291/06 Hüseyin KAYAOĞLU 03/03/2020 13325/10 Orhan MİROĞLU 11/02/2020 79602/16+ Fadim SALUR AND 4 OTHER APPLICATIONS 28/05/2020 16808/09 Ülken YÜCEL 28/05/2020 31773/10 Nazmi ZENGİN AND OTHERS 30/04/2020   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of friendly settlements as they appear in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Considering that in these cases the Court, having taken formal note of the friendly settlements reached by the government of the respondent State and the applicants and having been satisfied that the settlements were based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention or its Protocols, decided to strike these cases from its list;   Having satisfied itself that the terms of the friendly settlements were executed by the government of the respondent State,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 39, paragraph 4, of the Convention and   DECIDES to close their examination.