CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 5 décembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s25D5DE94 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } Communicated on 5 December 2020 Published on 21 December 2020   FIRST SECTION Application no. 19614/20 A.B. against Greece lodged on 14 May 2020 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the living conditions of the applicant, a pregnant woman at an advanced stage, in Pyli hotspot on the island of Kos. The Court applied Rule 39 of the Rules of Court in respect of the applicant.   QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard to the applicant’s vulnerability as a pregnant woman, has there been a violation of Article 3 and/or Article 8 of the Convention on account of her living conditions in and around Pyli hotspot on Kos island?