CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 8 décembre 2020

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .s91B575EA { width:99.4%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s944BDE53 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:36pt } .s2EAAAA4F { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2020)325 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 26 cases against the Republic of Moldova   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 8 December 2020 at the 1391 st meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 7359/06 AGURDINO S.R.L. 27/09/2011 29/10/2013 27/12/2011 24/03/2014 28648/05 BANCA INTERNAŢIONALĂ DE INVESTIŢII ŞI DEZVOLTARE MB S.A. 16/10/2012 16/01/2013 7516/10 BODIU 18/06/2019 18/06/2019 42572/09 BRANTOM INTERNATIONAL S.R.L. AND OTHERS 10/02/2015 10/02/2015 6338/11 CARPOV 12/02/2019 12/02/2019 11712/04 CEACHIR 15/01/2008 15/04/2008 24042/09+ CEREALE FLOR S.A. AND ROȘCA 14/02/2017 14/02/2017 35251/04 COJOCARU 15/11/2011 15/11/2011 18081/07 COLESNIC 05/03/2019 05/03/2019 27773/05+ CONSOCIVIL S.A. AND ZELINSCHI 28/05/2019 28/05/2019 16974/15 CONSTRUCT CONFORT S.R.L. 28/05/2019 28/05/2019 25575/08 DRAGOSTEA COPIILOR - PETROVSCHI - NAGORNII 13/09/2011 10/06/2014 13/12/2011 10/09/2014 12918/12 ELECTRONSERVICE-NORD S.A. 02/07/2019 23/06/2020 02/07/2019 23/06/2020 75/07 EUGENIA AND DOINA DUCA 03/03/2009 08/04/2014 14/09/2009 08/07/2014 72636/13 FURTUNĂ 23/06/2020 23/06/2020 35367/08 IPTEH SA AND OTHERS 24/11/2009 29/06/2010 24/02/2010 29/10/2010 53773/00 ISTRATE 13/06/2006 13/09/2006 24446/09 IURII 13/12/2016 13/12/2016 28430/06 JOMIRU AND CREŢU 17/04/2012 17/04/2012 22820/09 LIPCAN 17/12/2013 17/12/2013 6923/03 MELNIC 14/11/2006 14/02/2007 30475/03 MOLDOVAHIDROMAS 27/02/2007 13/05/2008 27/05/2007 Friendly settlement 37225/07+ PIRNAU AND OTHERS 31/01/2012 31/01/2012 67576/10 PIETRIS S.A. 03/12/2013 03/12/2013 28439/05 SFINX-IMPEX S.A. 25/09/2012 25/012/2012 44721/08 STRUGARU 22/10/2013 22/10/2013   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of the quashing of final domestic judgments in breach with the principle of legal certainty and the violation of the applicants’ property rights (violations of Article 6, paragraph 1, and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments, including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2020)1037);   Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved, given that the damages suffered by the applicants were covered by the just satisfaction awarded by the Court or redressed at the domestic level following the reopening of the impugned domestic proceedings;      Recalling that the question of the general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Popov (no. 2) group of cases (Application No. 19960/04 ) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.