CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 3 décembre 2020

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s588DF192 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .sA25E5722 { margin-top:4.8pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s3443D10F { font-weight:bold; color:#333333 } .s5CCE9E90 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .sF4E4AFBA { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .s798B568D { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .sC6F37A61 { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .s1C93675A { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .sB9C2D5DC { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .s60926251 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .sB9AE580D { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#ffffff } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s2EAAAA4F { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2020)295 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 12 cases against Ukraine   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 3 December 2020 at the 1390 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 47921/08 AZYUKOVSKA 17/12/2019 17/12/2019 4287/19 BEZOTECHESKA 19/12/2019 19/12/2019 16003/18 GRYNENKO AND PORTORENKO 19/092019 19/092019 8490/19+ KOSTERNYY AND MAZUR 03/10/2019 03/10/2019 22408/08+ KUDRYASHOV AND OTHERS 20/12/2018 20/12/2018 20930/06 PONOMARENKO 21/12/2010 21/12/2010 36600/09 RADZEVIL 10/12/2019 10/03/2020 60085/12+ RASHITOV AND OTHERS 29/03/2018 29/03/2018 4940/19 RUDENKO 05/12/2019 05/12/2019 15918/07+ SHAMRAY AND OTHERS 18/05/2017 18/05/2017 26007/17 ZABARA 07/11/2019 07/11/2019 3431/03 YURYEVA AND YURYEV 31/07/2012 17/12/2012   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of excessive length of criminal/civil proceedings as well as the lack of effective remedy in this respect (violations of Articles 6, paragraph 1, and 13);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required: -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see DH-DD(2020)612 );   Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved in these cases, given that the criminal/civil proceedings have been terminated;   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined in the framework of the Merit and Svetlana   Naumenko groups of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in the cases listed below as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.