CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 12 novembre 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-206529
- Date
- 12 novembre 2020
- Publication
- 12 novembre 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s4B8D41EE { font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt } .s25D5DE94 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Communicated on 12 November 2020 Published on 30 November 2020   FIRST SECTION Application no. 47596/19 Pál BANYA against Hungary and 5 other applications (see list appended) SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern the applicants’ conviction to life imprisonment and the fact that their mandatory pardon proceedings can take place only after having served forty years. The applicants allege a breach of Article 3 of the Convention. Mr Bánya was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder by the Budapest Court of Appeal on 26 June 2019. His complaint lodged with the Constitutional Court is still pending. Mr Ráduly was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder by the Debrecen Court of Appeal on 24 September 2013. Mr Georgiev was sentenced to life imprisonment on 20 June 2019 by the Szeged Court of Appeal for trafficking in human beings, murder and causing grievous bodily harm. Mr Kabai was found guilty of murder, animal cruelty and theft on 25   April 2012 by the Debrecen Court of Appeal and was sentenced to life imprisonment. Mr Szurdok was found guilty of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Debrecen Court of Appeal on 16 September 2010. Mr Tóth was found guilty of murder, attempted murder and attempted rape and sentenced to life imprisonment by the Szeged Court of Appeal on 10 February 2012 .   QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Have the applicants been deprived of any real prospect of release and thus potentially subjected to inhuman punishment, in breach of Article 3 of the Convention, in view of the fact that they will not be eligible for the mandatory pardon proceedings before having served forty years of imprisonment (see T.P. and A.T. v. Hungary , nos.   37871/14 and 73986/14, 4   October 2016)?     APPENDIX   No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth   Represented by 1 47596/19 Bánya v. Hungary 26/08/2019 Pál BÁNYA 1984   Dániel András KARSAI 2 54087/19 Ráduly v. Hungary 09/10/2019 Zsolt Gyula RÁDULY 1974   Dániel András KARSAI 3 2614/20 Georgiev v. Hungary 19/12/2019 Metodi Ivanov GEORGIEV 1986   Dániel András KARSAI 4 5882/20 Kabai v. Hungary 16/01/2020 Csaba KABAI 1973   Dániel András KARSAI 5 13518/20 Szurdok v. Hungary 04/03/2020 János SZURDOK 1983   Dániel András KARSAI 6 13783/20 Tóth v. Hungary 06/03/2020 István TÓTH 1966   Dániel András KARSAI  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 12 novembre 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-206529
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel