CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 1 octobre 2020

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2E49B105 { background-color:#ffffff } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s944BDE53 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:36pt } .s2EAAAA4F { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2020)210 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 18 cases against Ukraine   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 1 October 2020 at the 1383 rd meeting of the Ministers' Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 52652/07 GAVULA 16/05/2013 07/10/2013 9450/06 SOSNOVSKIY 08/12/2016 08/12/2016 4772/06 KOMAROV 19/01/2017 19/01/2017 37240/07 KIYASHKO 23/02/2017 23/02/2017 3001/06 MALCHENKO AND OTHERS 06/04/2017 06/04/2017 24107/13 D.S. 09/11/2017 09/11/2017 32392/07 LADA 06/02/2018 06/02/2018 45811/16 MAYSTRENKO 28/06/2018 28/06/2018 24874/08 BAKCHIZHOV 30/10/2018 30/10/2018 31283/17 OSIPENKOV 29/01/2019 29/01/2019 70043/17 GARUMOV 06/06/2019 06/06/2019 27805/18 RADYUKIN 11/07/2019 11/07/2019 57240/14 SERZHANTOV 11/07/2019 11/07/2019 46196/11 SMILYANSKAYA 21/11/2019 21/11/2019 17853/19 TSATSENKO 05/12/2019 05/12/2019 78484/11 STRYUKOV 23/01/2020 23/01/2020 52826/18 MESHTESHUG 06/02/2020 06/02/2020 49614/18 GERASIN 06/02/2020 06/02/2020   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established on account of poor conditions of detention and transportation, lack of medical care in detention and lack of effective remedies thereof; irregularities of the detention on remand; excessive length of proceedings or of pre-trial detention and failure to comply with an interim measure indicated by the Court under Rule 39;   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action plan provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2020)625 );   Considering that the question of individual measures was therefore resolved, given that the applicants are no longer in detention, criminal proceedings have ended, and the just satisfaction where awarded by the Court has been paid;   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Nevmerzhitsky , Ignatov , Merit and Salakhov and Islyamova groups of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures required ;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.