CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 2 octobre 2020
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-205605
- Date
- 2 octobre 2020
- Publication
- 2 octobre 2020
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s3B53EBCA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify; font-size:7pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s25D5DE94 { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:7pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 2 October 2020 Published on 19 October 2020   THIRD SECTION Application no. 5863/20 Dmitriy Nikolayevich KOVALCHUK against Russia lodged on 21 January 2020 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the granting of a residence order in respect of the applicant’s children to the mother. The expert psychologists and the childcare authorities found that it would be in the children’s best interests to live with the father. The domestic courts found “no exceptional circumstances justifying [the children]’s separation from their mother”.     QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the decision to grant the residence order in respect of his children to their mother violate the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention? Did the domestic courts give sufficient reasons for their decision to give the residence order to the mother? In particular, did they conduct an in ‑ depth examination of the entire family situation and a whole series of relevant factors, in particular factors of a factual, emotional, psychological, material and medical nature, and did they make a balanced and reasonable assessment of the respective interests of each person, with a constant concern for determining what the best solution would be for the children (see Petrov and X v. Russia , no.   23608/16, § 98, 23 October 2018, with further references)? The parties are requested to submit copies of the childcare authorities’ opinions, and to indicate the date of the applicant’s separation from his former wife.   2.     Did the decision to grant the residence order to the children’s mother rather than to the applicant on the sole ground that “there were no exceptional circumstances justifying [the children]’s separation from their mother” amount to discrimination against the applicant on grounds of sex, contrary to Article   14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article   8?  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 2 octobre 2020
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-205605
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel