CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 21 septembre 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Communicated on 21 September 2020 Published on 12 October 2020   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 33322/17 Slobodan IBRIĆ and Milorad PETROVIĆ against Serbia lodged on 26 April 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns the death of the applicants’ sons in a motor car accident and the ensuing investigation. It raises issues under Article 2 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Have the applicants exhausted all effective domestic remedies, as required by Article   35 §   1 of the Convention? In particular, having regard to the Court’s case-law (see, mutatis mutandis , S.V. and S.V. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (dec.), no. 31989/06, 10 April 2012), did the applicants invoke before the national authorities, at least in substance, the rights under Article   2 on which they now wish to rely before the Court?   2.     Having regard to the procedural protection of the right to life (see Nicolae Virgiliu Tănase v. Romania [GC], no. 41720/13, §§ 160-171, 25   June 2019), was the investigation in the present case in breach of Article   2 of the Convention?