CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 27 mai 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 27 May 2020 Published on 15 June 2020   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 20854/15 Milan MILINKOVIĆ against Serbia lodged on 22 April 2015 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE Following disciplinary proceedings against him, the applicant was dismissed from a post of a detention guard at the Valjevo Juvenile Detention Centre ( Kazneno-popravni zavod za maloletnike ). On 23   September 2011 in judicial review proceedings the Administrative Court upheld the applicant’s dismissal without holding a public hearing although the applicant had expressly requested it. On 30 October 2014 the Constitutional Court upheld that decision. The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the lack of a public hearing before the Administrative Court. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to a fair and public hearing in the determination of his civil rights and obligations, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, among other authorities, Ramos   Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal [GC] , nos. 55391/13, 57728/13 and 74041/13, §§ 187-192 and 209-211, 6 November 2018, and Motion Pictures Guarantors Ltd. v. Serbia , no. 28353/06, §§ 30-37, 8 June 2010)?