CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 24 mars 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Communicated on 24 March 2020 Published on 28 May 2020   THIRD SECTION Application no. 49378/18 Greta BARTOLO PARNIS against Malta and 3 other applications (see list appended) The facts and complaints in these applications have been summarised in the Court’s decision, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     In relation to apartments 11B, 20B, 24C, 30C, 33C, 41D, 44D, 46D and 49D, has there been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in the present case following the enactment of Act no. XVIII of 2007?   2.     In relation to apartments 11B, 20B, 24C, 30C, 33C, 41D, 44D, 46D and 49D, did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, as required by Article 13 of the Convention? In particular, having regard to the absence of an order for the eviction of the tenants, can constitutional redress proceedings be considered effective (see, mutatis   mutandis , Apap   Bologna v.   Malta , no.   46931/12, 30   August 2016)?     APPENDIX   No. Application no. Case name Lodged on Applicant Year of Birth Place of Residence Nationality 1 49378/18 Bartolo Parnis v. Malta 17/10/2018 Greta BARTOLO PARNIS 1965 Pembroke Maltese 2 49380/18 Anastasi v. Malta 17/10/2018 Patricia ANASTASI 1963 Swieqi Maltese 3 49496/18 Saddemi v. Malta 17/10/2018 Anna Maria SADDEMI 1960 St Julians Maltese 4 49676/18 Azzopardi v. Malta 17/10/2018 Josephine AZZOPARDI 1958 St. Julian’s Maltese