CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 25 mars 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s4B163ECD { width:87.22%; border-collapse:collapse } .sE87BCA71 { width:8.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s26066BE5 { width:25.18%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s7679E20D { width:22.96%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sE09BE2E8 { width:20.64%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sE1C6376A { width:22.58%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sB8882FFD { width:8.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB1E4244A { width:25.18%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA4FA38D7 { width:22.96%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s818FCB3E { width:20.64%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s770D5A36 { width:22.58%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Communicated on 25 March 2020 Published on 25 May 2020   THIRD SECTION Application no. 44799/19 Ignasi CENTELLES MAS and Others against Spain lodged on 14 August 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The application concerns the applicants’ criminal conviction by the Tarragona Court of Appeal ( Audiencia Provincial ) for negligent manslaughter and offence against the rights of workers, after they had been acquitted in the first instance court. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the applicants have a fair trial in the determination of the criminal charges against them, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the applicants’ conviction by the Audiencia Provincial of Tarragona, after acquittal by the first instance court, compatible with the requirements of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and the principle of immediacy, considering that the conviction was based on the alleged reconsideration of the facts established by the first instance court without direct examination of evidence by the Audiencia Provincial (see, among others, Igual Coll v. Spain , no. 37496/04, §§ 27, 35-37, 10 March 2009; Găitănaru v. Romania , no. 26082/05, § 24, 26 June 2012; Camacho   Camacho v. Spain , no. 32914/16, § 34, 24 September 2019)? APPENDIX   No. Applicant’s Name Birth date Nationality Place of residence 1 Ignasi CENTELLES MAS 01/04/1972 Spanish Aldea 2 Gerard FERRERES GASULLA 16/04/1975 Spanish Els Reguers 3 Gerard PLA CANALDA 18/05/1984 Spanish Tortosa