CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 20 janvier 2020

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 20 January 2020 Published on 10 February 2020   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 23476/15 Oleg Ignatiyovych YAKHYMOVYCH against Ukraine lodged on 29 April 2015 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applicant was convicted of having attempted to hire a contract killer to murder a third party. The application concerns his complaints that: (i) he was allegedly entrapped into committing the offence by agents provocateurs acting on the authorities’ instructions; (ii) Mr I., the undercover agent who was supposed to act as the killer, was not examined at the trial. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against him, in accordance with Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention and in particular in the light of: 1.1.     his allegation that he had been entrapped into committing the offence by agents provocateurs acting on the authorities’ instructions; 1.2.     his complaint under Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention that I. was not examined at the trial ?