CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 29 novembre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 29 November 2019   THIRD SECTION Application no. 41075/19 Sergey Nikolayevich MATVEYEV against Russia lodged on 19 July 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns an alleged failure of the State to assist the applicant in enforcement of a judgment against a private party (Article 6 § 1 of the Convention). QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the State authorities take appropriate steps to assist the applicant in the enforcement of the judgment against a private party, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Kesyan v. Russia , no. 36496/02, §§   64 ‑ 65, 19 October 2006; Kunashko v. Russia , no. 36337/03, §§ 38-39, 17   December 2009; and Smagilov v. Russia (dec.), no.   24324/05, § 37, 13   November 2014)?