CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 14 octobre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 14 October 2019   THIRD SECTION Application no. 43683/19 Ildar Fidarikovich GARIFULLIN against Russia lodged on 3 August 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns an alleged failure of the State to assist the applicant in enforcement of a judgment against a private party (Article 6 § 1 of the Convention). QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Did the State authorities take appropriate steps to assist the applicant in the enforcement of the judgment against a private party, as required by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Kesyan v. Russia , no. 36496/02, §§   64 ‑ 65, 19 October 2006; Kunashko v. Russia , no. 36337/03, §§ 38-39, 17   December 2009; and Smagilov v. Russia (dec.), no.   24324/05, § 37, 13   November 2014)?