CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 16 septembre 2019
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-196814
- Date
- 16 septembre 2019
- Publication
- 16 septembre 2019
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 16 September 2019   THIRD SECTION Application no. 27429/16 Michal TRUBAN against Slovakia lodged on 11 May 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s right of access to a court. The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the Constitutional Court quashed the appellate court’s judgment, which was favourable to him, upon the constitutional complaint lodged by the other party to the proceedings for protection of personality rights, without informing him and giving him a chance to participate in the constitutional proceedings. The applicant complains, furthermore, that in such situation and without taking any evidence the Constitutional Court assessed the facts of the case and reached conclusions about the balance to be struck between his personality rights and the defendant’s freedom of expression, which are binding for the appellate court to which the case had been remitted. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Having regard to the fact that the applicant could not take part in the proceedings before the Constitutional Court, and to the effect of the outcome of those proceedings on the applicant’s civil rights and obligations, was the applicant’s right of access to a court respected (see e.g. López Guió v. Slovakia , no. 10280/12, 3 June 2014)?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 16 septembre 2019
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-196814
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel