CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 16 septembre 2019
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-196780
- Date
- 16 septembre 2019
- Publication
- 16 septembre 2019
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 16 September 2019   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 73731/17 Culiță EPURE against Romania lodged on 11 April 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the ill-treatment suffered by the applicant in prison, which started, according to his claims, on 6 December 2016, due to the inadequate management of his psychiatric condition. In particular, the applicant alleges that the prison authorities have not taken appropriate measures to accommodate his needs determined by his mental disability, by ensuring, inter alia , that he receives adequate medical care and permanent assistance. The applicant was released from prison on 16 June 2019. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Were the conditions of the applicant’s detention, which started on 6   December 2016 compatible with the requirements of Article 3 of the Convention? In particular: (a)     was the applicant’s health compatible with his detention conditions? (b)     were there any legal means for transferring a person with a mental disability such as the applicant from prison to an adequate psychiatric facility?   2.     Has the applicant benefited, in detention, of medical care adequate to his mental condition and in compliance with his doctor’s recommendations?   3.     Has the applicant benefited from the help of a personal assistant in compliance with the medical recommendations issued in his respect?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 16 septembre 2019
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-196780
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel