CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 3 septembre 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:justify } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 1 March 2017 and 3 September 2019   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 13982/12 ALFA MOBIL 1800 S.R.O. against Hungary lodged on 29 February 2012 The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTIONS 1.     The parties are invited to provide detailed factual information on the proceedings related to the confiscation of the goods in the course of the administrative and criminal proceedings. In particular, they are invited to submit information about the expert opinions obtained in the course of the criminal proceedings. Moreover, the parties are invited to submit copies of any intervening decisions, in particular the decision of the Budapest XVIII/XIX District Court ( Budapest XVIII. és XIX. Kerületi Bíróság ) of 3   December 2014 on the confiscation of goods.   2.     Was there a remedy available to the applicant company to challenge the decision of the Budapest XVIII/XIX District Court of 3   December 2014?   3.     Was there a remedy available to the applicant company to challenge the decision of the Budapest Supervisory Public Prosecutor’s Office ( Budapest Törvényességi Felügyeleti Ügyészség ) of 29 September 2011?   4.     Was there any other legal avenue open for the applicant company to claim the confiscated goods?