CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 25 juin 2019
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-194745
- Date
- 25 juin 2019
- Publication
- 25 juin 2019
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sE207830C { margin-top:54pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s85646119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:12pt } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s23406F07 { margin-left:33.01pt; text-align:justify; padding-left:2.99pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt } Communicated on 25 June 2019   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 21325/19 Y.F.C. and Others against the Netherlands lodged on 20 April 2019 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE On 11 April 2019 the applicants, who are all Venezuelan nationals, were apprehended in the territorial waters of Curaçao. That same day they were issued decisions denying them entry, declaring them undesirable aliens, announcing their expulsion and ordering their placement in immigration detention to ensure their departure. After the applicants had lodged an objection, a procedure concerning protection under Article 3 of the Convention was started which is currently still pending. The applicants raise complaints under Articles 3 and 5 §§ 1 (f), 2 and 4 of the Convention in relation to their detention, and under Article 4 of Protocol No. 4. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Have the applicants exhausted all effective domestic remedies, as required by Article   35 §   1 of the Convention?   2.     Have the applicants been subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment whilst in detention, in breach of Article   3 of the Convention? 2a.     Are the applicants enabled to go outside and get fresh air and, if so, with what frequency and for how long? 2b.     Are the applicants free to decline to meet with Venezuelan consular staff whilst in detention? 2c.     Is an investigation being or has it been conducted, and, if so, by whom, into the incident of 9 June 2019 in the course of which some of the applicants were allegedly hit by rubber bullets fired by a police special team?   3.     Are the applicants deprived of their liberty in breach of Article   5 §   1 of the Convention? In particular, does the deprivation of liberty fall within the first or second limb of paragraph (f) of this provision?   4.     Is the applicants’ detention “in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law”?   5.     What action, if any, is being and/or has been undertaken to remove the applicants to Venezuela?   6.     Were the applicants informed promptly, in a language which they understood, of the reasons for their arrest, as required by Article   5 §   2 of the Convention?   7.     Did the applicant have at their disposal an effective and accessible procedure by which they could challenge the lawfulness of their detention, as required by Article   5 §   4 of the Convention?   8.     Did the decisions of 11 April 2019 of the Minister of Justice to expel the applicants amount to a violation of Article   4 of Protocol No.   4? 8a.     The Government are requested to make available to the Court audio and/or written records of the interviews held with the applicants on 11 April 2019.   APPENDIX   No. NAME Birth year Nationality Place of residence Representative   Y.F.C. 1980 Venezuelan Willemstad M. Elzinga-Soumah   F.C.C. 1980 Venezuelan Willemstad M. Elzinga-Soumah   J.M.A. 1976 Venezuelan Willemstad M. Elzinga-Soumah   J.R.A. 1985 Venezuelan Willemstad M. Elzinga-Soumah   R.T.M. 2002 Venezuelan Willemstad M. Elzinga-Soumah   N.M.O. 1974 Venezuelan Willemstad M. Elzinga-Soumah   C.V.S. 1992 Venezuelan Willemstad M. Elzinga-Soumah        Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 25 juin 2019
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-194745
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel