CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 17 juin 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 17 June 2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 49452/18 R.O. against Norway lodged on 15 October 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a decision to place the applicant’s son in foster care and limit her right to contact with her son to two hours, six times yearly. Under Article 8 of the Convention the applicant submits that the above entailed a violation of her right to respect for private life. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicant’s right to respect for her family life contrary to Article 8 of the Convention, through the authorities’ decision to place her son in foster care and limit her right to contact with her son to two hours, six times yearly (see, for example, K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, ECHR 2001 ‑ VII)?