CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 18 juin 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s339D85E6 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s665E407E { margin-top:66pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 18 June 2019   FIRST SECTION Application no. 67681/10 Aladin OSMANOVIĆ against Croatia lodged on 29 October 2010 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the Constitutional Court’s refusal to examine the merits of the applicant’s appeal against the decision ordering his detention. QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Was the procedure by which the applicant sought to challenge the lawfulness of his detention in conformity with Article 5 § 4 of the Convention, in particular in view of the Constitutional Court’s decision not to examine the merits of the applicant’s complaint ( Peša v. Croatia , no.   40523/08, 8 April 2010; Hađi v. Croatia , no. 42998/08, 1 July 2010; and Osmanović v. Croatia , no. 67604/10, 6 November 2012)?