CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 1 avril 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s7ACB8D74 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:14.2pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .sAC521AF { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sE512A940 { font-family:Arial; color:#474747 } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2E932ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:11pt }   Communicated on 26 October 2018 and 1 April 2019   THIRD SECTION Application no. 34663/17 Maksim Yevgenyevich IONOV against Russia and 9 other applications (see list appended)   The facts and complaints in these applications have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTION Regard being had to the parties’ submissions received by the Court, the Government have been requested to provide a response to the following question:   Having regard to the applicants’ situation in the instant case and to the Court’s findings in previous cases concerning the restrictions on prison visits and the lack of effective remedies for that complaint (see, as recent examples, Andrey Smirnov v. Russia , no. 43149/10, 13 February 2018, and Resin v. Russia , no. 9348/14, 18 December 2018), as well as to a large number of pending cases concerning the same issues, is that situation indicative of an underlying systemic problem or a structural deficiency which calls for indication of general measures under Article   46 of the Convention, as interpreted in the light of Article 1 of the Convention?   APPENDIX   List of applications   No. Application no. Case name Date of introduction 1. 34663/17 Ionov v. Russia 15/04/2017 2. 46573/17 Arzamasov v. Russia 01/05/2017 3.     76213/17 Sadriyev v. Russia 25/09/2017 4. 76929/17 Yelistratov v. Russia 04/10/2017 5. 2945/18 Yalakov v. Russia 30/11/2017 6. 8936/18 Garifullin v. Russia 27/12/2017 7.     27752/18 Mishin v. Russia 30/05/2018 8. 27907/18 Vladimir Savelchev v. Russia 24/05/2018 9. 28123/18 Nikolay Savelchev v. Russia 16/05/2018 10.     34962/18 Mishin v. Russia 03/07/2018