CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 25 mars 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 25 March 2019   THIRD SECTION Application no. 25566/18 Konstantin Konstantinovich DYACHENKO against Russia lodged on 15 May 2018 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s placement in a psychiatric facility for involuntary treatment (Article 5 § 1 of the Convention). The placement was ordered by the Baryshskiy Town Court of Ulyanovsk Region on 24   January 2018 with reference to the expert examination report dated 8   August 2017. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES Was the applicant deprived of his liberty in breach of Article   5 §   1 of the Convention? In particular, was the applicant’s placement in a psychiatric facility lawful given that the Baryshskiy Town Court of Ulyanovsk Region on 24 January 2018 took that decision with reference to the expert examination report issued on 8 August 2017, i.e. five months prior to the order? (see Trutko v. Russia , no. 40979/04, §§ 51-57, 6 December 2016)