CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 23 janvier 2019

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCEF82ED { width:101.06%; border-collapse:collapse } .s93D9D29C { width:10.3%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s3BEF28FC { width:20.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s859E3002 { width:10.6%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sD53C5358 { width:19.58%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sA1A9243B { width:16.68%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC7C98AF5 { width:22.2%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s9477513E { width:10.3%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s74DC3D21 { margin-left:33.01pt; padding-left:2.99pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .sD8FB2437 { width:20.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s858B1BD7 { width:10.6%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB6558D35 { width:19.58%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4C6C1307 { width:16.68%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sED3FA8B4 { width:22.2%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Communicated on 23 January 2019   SECOND SECTION Application no. 66728/10 Ayşe ŞENOĞUL and Others against Turkey lodged on 27 October 2010 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the de facto expropriation of the applicants’ land and the interest rate applied to the compensation awarded to them as a result. The applicants complain of a violation of their rights under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, on account of the insufficiency of the interest rate applied to the compensation awarded to them for the administration’s de facto expropriation of their land (see Sarıca and Dilaver v. Turkey , no. 11765/05, 27   May 2010)?   APPENDIX   No. Firstname LASTNAME Birth year Nationality Place of residence Representative   Ayşe ŞENOĞUL 1961 Turkish İzmir S. Sert   Ahmet KIYAK 1959 Turkish İzmir S. Sert   Mehmet KIYAK 1957 Turkish İzmir S. Sert   Mustafa KIYAK 1968 Turkish İzmir S. Sert