CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 15 janvier 2019
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-189916
- Date
- 15 janvier 2019
- Publication
- 15 janvier 2019
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s490BB043 { width:95.04%; border-collapse:collapse } .s75B6FE49 { width:7.92%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s4200F6FD { width:19.68%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s1B95A696 { width:26.54%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s859E3002 { width:10.6%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s6AA49A73 { width:18.94%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sD2BC34B3 { width:16.34%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC3E2F90B { width:7.92%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s3FA4A79A { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sE74C84FB { width:20.99pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s782881DE { width:19.68%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA8A5C668 { width:26.54%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s858B1BD7 { width:10.6%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s43CFDBE7 { width:18.94%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sE6CF84F6 { width:16.34%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Communicated on 15 January 2019   FOURTH SECTION Applications nos. 10600/18 and 17504/18 Gheorghița BRĂNIȘTEANU against Romania and Ioan-Dumitru MIRONESCU against Romania lodged on 24 April 2018 and 23 March 2018 respectively SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications concern a restriction placed on the applicants’ right to vote while in detention, by Decision no. 72/2016 issued by the Central Electoral Office which provided that detainees could vote if they served their sentence in a prison which was situated in the same constituency as their habitual residence. The applicants were unable to vote in the parliamentary elections of 2016, because at that date they were being held in prisons which were outside their constituencies. Their right to vote had not been restricted by the criminal sentences imposed on them. The complaints lodged by the applicants about the said restriction were dismissed as unfounded by the Craiova District Court in the final decision no. 352 of 6   February 2018 (application no. 10600/18) and by the Iaşi District Court in the final decision no. 1192 of 23 November 2017 (application no.   17504/18), respectively. The applicants relied on Articles 3, 10 and 14 of the Convention and on Article   3 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been a breach of the applicants’ right under Article 3 of Protocol   No.   1 to vote in free elections which have ensured the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature? APPENDIX   No. Application no. Firstname LASTNAME Birth year Nationality Place of residence                 10600/18 Gheorghița BRĂNIȘTEANU 1958 Romanian Craiova Prison                 17504/18 Ioan-Dumitru MIRONESCU 1973 Romanian Vaslui Prison  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 15 janvier 2019
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-189916
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel