CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 22 novembre 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-188509
- Date
- 22 novembre 2018
- Publication
- 22 novembre 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sEA75BD01 { width:106.24%; border-collapse:collapse } .s5F47248E { width:10.16%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .s857E6C3D { width:17.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sA24D7BD8 { width:15.84%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sB6D86B9 { width:15.86%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sE5627FA5 { width:22.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sD130B00A { width:10.16%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s74DC3D21 { margin-left:33.01pt; padding-left:2.99pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s55307A23 { width:17.62%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s389C5BA4 { width:15.84%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA080519D { width:15.86%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s9B7A7BB6 { width:22.9%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s3192C8A1 { margin-left:36pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold }   Communicated on 22 November 2018   SECOND SECTION Application no. 55149/11 Ayşe Ayşın ŞIHMAN and Others against Turkey lodged on 5 August 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a dispute over the ownership of a piece of land (plot no.203) registered in the name of Treasury following a cadastral survey. The applicants objected to this registration, arguing that their title deeds, which they had acquired from the Treasury in 1934 as a result of an auction, had been disregarded. Their objection was rejected by the domestic courts which considered, among other things, that although the applicants’ title deeds had covered the disputed land, their claims had to be rejected in that they had not used it. The applicants complain under Article   1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention that by disregarding their title deeds, the domestic courts deprived them of their property without compensation. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicants’ peaceful enjoyment of possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol   No.   1?   Have the applicants been deprived of their possessions in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1? In particular, did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants given the apparent absence of compensation? APPENDIX   No. First name Last Name Birth year Nationality Place of residence Representative   Ayşe Ayşın ŞIHMAN 1936 Turkish Mersin   H. Dölek   Ayşegül FIRAT 1959 Turkish Mersin   H. Dölek   Feride Funda İREGÖL 1955 Turkish Mersin   H. Dölek   Emine Nil ÖZKILINÇ 1951 Turkish Mersin   H. Dölek   Ahmet Cem ŞIHMAN 1959 Turkish Mersin   H. Dölek   Hasan ŞIHMAN 1951 Turkish Mersin   H. Dölek   Havvana ŞIHMAN 1931 Turkish Mersin   H. Dölek   İbrahim Erman ŞIHMAN 1951 Turkish Mersin   H. Dölek   İlhan Uğur ŞIHMAN 1963 Turkish Mersin   H. Dölek   Hamide UCUZ 1954 Turkish Mersin   H. Dölek   Şükran YILDIRIM 1964 Turkish Mersin   H. Dölek  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 22 novembre 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-188509
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel