CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 28 août 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 7 November 2016 and 28 August 2018   THIRD SECTION Application no. 35237/14 Valentina Dmitriyevna YERMAKOVICH against Russia lodged on 12 March 2015   The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTION Regard being had to the parties’ submissions received by the Court, the Government are requested to provide an answer to question 4 contained in the Statement of the facts of the application and Questions to the parties appended to the Court’s letter of 15 November 2016. In particular, the question reads as follows:   As regards the authorities’ decision invalidating the applicant’s Russian passport, has there been an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for he private life, within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention?   If so, was that interference in accordance with the law and necessary in terms of Article 8 § 2?