CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 28 août 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-186332
- Date
- 28 août 2018
- Publication
- 28 août 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s75A32C27 { border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   Communicated on 28 August 2018   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 59462/14 Aynura Imran gizi IMRANOVA against Azerbaijan and 4 other applications (see list appended) SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern the freezing of the applicants’ bank accounts by the domestic authorities within the framework of criminal proceedings concerning the alleged unlawful activities of a number of non-governmental organisations. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been an interference with the applicants’ peaceful enjoyment of possessions, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No.   1 to the Convention, on account of the freezing of their bank accounts? If so, was that interference lawful and necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest? In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants (see Immobiliare   Saffi v. Italy, [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?   2.     Did the applicants, except the applicant in application no. 59462/14, have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article   6 §   1 of the Convention? In particular, was their right of access to court respected?   3.     Did the applicants, except the applicant in application no. 59462/14, have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, as required by Article   13 of the Convention?   4.     Has there been an interference with the applicants’, except the applicant in application no. 59462/14, freedom of association, within the meaning of Article   11 §   1 of the Convention, on account of the freezing of their bank accounts? If so, was that interference prescribed by law and necessary in terms of Article   11 § 2?   5.     Were the restrictions imposed by the State in the present cases, except in application no. 59462/14, purportedly pursuant to Article 11 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, applied for a purpose other than those envisaged by those provisions, contrary to Article   18 of the Convention?   APPENDIX   No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Represented by   59462/14 19/08/2014 Aynura IMRANOVA 11/11/1976 Zardab   Khalid BAGIROV   74275/14 26/11/2014 CENTER FOR NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES   Khalid BAGIROV   74333/14 19/11/2014 INSTITUTE FOR REPORTERS FREEDOM AND SAFETY PUBLIC UNION     Khalid BAGIROV   74559/14 26/11/2014 Emin HUSEYNOV 04/12/1979 Geneva   Khalid BAGIROV   24212/15 12/05/2015 CAUCASUS MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER PUBLIC ASSOCIATION   Khalid BAGIROV  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 28 août 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-186332
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel