CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 juin 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-184376
- Date
- 4 juin 2018
- Publication
- 4 juin 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sC7EAD8B { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s77BBF59F { width:138.5%; border-collapse:collapse } .s6BA5D364 { width:6.74%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .s3984BAEE { width:27.04%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s3A95F125 { width:12.54%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sA4DE9DE { width:11.82%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sEB186BCE { width:13.48%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s9CE7A2EC { width:28.38%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s42B1CDD7 { width:6.74%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sA9525B0D { margin-left:33.01pt; text-align:center; padding-left:2.99pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .sC2F2E002 { width:27.04%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s96EC09CF { width:12.54%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sAD166573 { width:11.82%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s67D3D224 { width:13.48%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s8EE9C32F { width:28.38%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Communicated on 4 June 2018   FIRST SECTION Application no. 9112/10 Luigi AUTRU RYOLO and Others against Italy lodged on 14 January 2010 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns the expropriation of the applicants’ land and the calculation of the expropriation compensation due to them in accordance with Article 5bis of Law No. 359 of 1992 and Article 16 of Law No. 865 of 1971. Pursuant to the latter provisions, the applicants’ land had been classified as agricultural and they were awarded compensation reflecting the “average agricultural value” ( valore agricolo medio ) criterion. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Have the applicants been deprived of their property in accordance with the requirements of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? In particular, did the deprivation of property impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants on account of the amount awarded to them as expropriation compensation (see Preite v. Italy , no. 28976/05, 17 November 2015)?     LIST OF APPLICANTS   N o . Firstname LASTNAME Birth date Place of residence Date of demise Heirs   Luigi AUTRU RYOLO 26/04/1931 Messine 22/02/2018 Tommaso AUTRU RYOLO Carlo AUTRU RYOLO   Laura AUTRU RYOLO 26/10/1962 Messine 13/10/2016 Tommaso AUTRU RYOLO Carlo AUTRU RYOLO   Carlo AUTRU RYOLO 02/12/1963 Messine /     Tommaso AUTRU RYOLO 24/08/1965 Messine /      Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 4 juin 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-184376
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel