CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 7 juin 2018

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s3CC4D07E { font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5FFF0A7E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:8pt } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s63D113AA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:35.45pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2EAAAA4F { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)226 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 53 cases against Republic of Moldova   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 7 June 2018at the 1318 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases (see Appendix) and to the violations established mainly on account of the failure or substantial delay in the enforcement of final domestic judicial decisions, the lack of an effective remedy in this respect and of violations of the right to peaceful enjoyment of the applicants’ possessions (violations of Article 6, paragraph   1, Article 13 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see documents DH-DD(2015)48 , DH-DD(2017)42 , DH-DD(2017)42-add , DH-DD(2017)1336 );   Considering that the question of individual measures has been resolved in these cases, given that the relevant domestic court decisions were enforced, and that all necessary individual measures have also been taken in respect of the other violations found by the Court;   Considering further the significant progress achieved with regard to the general measures, notably the continued provision of sufficient budgetary allocations for the enforcement of domestic decisions against the State;   Noting that the question of the outstanding general measures required in response to the shortcomings found by the Court in the present judgments continue to be examined within the framework of the Olaru and Others v. Republic of Moldova group (Application No. 476/07) and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the remaining general measures, namely the overall effectiveness of the reformed enforcement system, in particular as regards private debtors, and the functioning of the domestic remedy introduced in case of prolonged enforcement proceedings;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases. Appendix   Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 2916/02 LUNTRE AND OTHERS 15/06/2004 15/09/2004 2886/05 AVRAM 09/12/2008 05/06/2009 29808/02 AVRAMENKO 06/02/2007 26/01/2010 06/05/2007 26/01/2010 31530/03 BAIBARAC 15/11/2005 15/02/2006 32760/04 BANCA VIAS 06/11/2007 06/02/2008 36438/08 BAZA DE TRANSPORT AUTO NR. 1 18/11/2014 18/11/2014 32347/04 BECCIU 13/11/2007 13/02/2008 25238/02+ BIŢA AND OTHERS 25/09/2007 25/12/2007 18872/02+ BOCANCEA AND OTHERS 06/07/2004 06/10/2004 19981/02 BOTNARI 19/06/2007 19/09/2007 27533/04 BUIANOVSCHI 16/10/2007 16/01/2008 27883/04 BULAVA 08/01/2008 08/04/2008 55349/07+ BUREA AND OTHERS 13/12/2011 13/12/2011 31043/04 COGUT 04/12/2007 04/03/2008 39745/02 COOPERATIVA AGRICOLA SLOBOZIA-HANESEI 03/04/2007 03/07/2007 18882/02 CROITORU 20/07/2004 20/10/2004 46581/99 DANILIUC 18/10/2005 18/01/2006 7365/05 DECEV 24/02/2009 24/05/2009 14925/03 DELIUCHIN 23/10/2007 23/01/2008 33276/03 DEORDIEV AND DEORDIEV 16/10/2007 16/01/2008 75975/01 DRAGUTA 31/10/2006 31/01/2007 20940/03 DUMBRAVEANU 24/05/2005 24/08/2005 6484/05 FEDOTOV 15/12/2009 15/03/2010 35994/03 GRIVNEAC 09/10/2007 09/01/2008 40541/04 LIPATNIKOVA AND RUDIC 23/10/2007 23/01/2008 20567/02 LOZAN AND OTHERS 10/10/2006 10/01/2007 3021/02 LUNGU 09/05/2006 09/08/2006 3417/02 LUPACESCU AND OTHERS 21/03/2006 21/06/2006 17359/04 MARCU 16/10/2007 16/01/2008 1115/02 MAZEPA 10/05/2007 10/08/2007 27261/04 MISTREANU 15/11/2011 15/11/2011 31790/03 MIZERNAIA 25/09/2007 25/12/2007 12708/05 MOCANU 17/05/2011 17/05/2011 14914/03 MOISEI 19/12/2006 19/03/2007 18726/04 NADULISNEAC ION 16/10/2007 16/01/2008 38503/08 NORMA S.R.L. 03/11/2011 17/05/2016 03/11/2011 17/05/2016 9898/02 PASTELI AND OTHERS 15/06/2004 15/09/2004 74153/01 POPOV 18/01/2005 17/01/2006 18/04/2005 17/04/2006 2914/02 PREPELIŢĂ 23/09/2008 23/12/2008 49806/99 PRODAN 18/05/2004 25/04/2006 10/11/2004 25/07/2006 3479/04 RUSU 15/01/2008 15/04/2008 20864/03 SCUTARI 26/07/2005 26/10/2005 73562/01+ SÎRBU AND OTHERS 15/06/2004 10/11/2004 6811/08+ STOG AND OTHERS 03/11/2011 03/11/2011 18893/04 TIBERNEAC 16/10/2007 31/03/2008 26103/04 TIBERNEAC VASILE 16/10/2007 16/01/2008 22970/02 ŢÎMBAL 14/09/2004 14/12/2004 36341/03+ TUDOR-AUTO S.R.L. AND TRIPLU-TUDOR S.R.L. 09/12/2008 09/02/2016 09/03/2009 09/05/2016 27568/02 UNGUREANU 06/09/2007 06/12/2007 19245/03 UNISTAR VENTURES GMBH 09/12/2008 09/03/2009 10543/02 VACARENCU 27/03/2008 27/06/2008 12674/07+ VARTIC AND OTHERS 20/09/2011 20/12/2011 6901/03 VITAN 16/10/2007 16/01/2008