CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 7 juin 2018

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s3CC4D07E { font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s2EAAAA4F { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify } .s33510801 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; widows:0; orphans:0 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sF29177A6 { height:1pt } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s33400262 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:10pt; line-height:115% } Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)219 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Salduz and 83 other cases against Turkey   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 7 June 2018at the 1318 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases (see list in Appendix) and to the violations established;   Recalling that these cases principally concern violations of the right to a fair trial arising from the fact that, pursuant to section 31 of Law No. 3842 which was then in force, the applicants, as persons accused of committing offences falling within the jurisdiction of the State Security Courts, were systematically denied access to a lawyer during questioning at police stations and that the statements they made were subsequently admitted in evidence at trial (violations of Article 6   §   3(c) in conjunction with Article 6   §   1);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the revised action reports and communication received from the authorities indicating the measures adopted to give effect to the judgments, including the information provided regarding the reopening of the proceedings, where requested by the applicants, and the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court, together with the current situation as regards the relevant legal framework (see documents DH-DD(2017)478 , DH-DD(2017)544 and DH-DD(2018)329 );   Having also examined the two communications from NGOs submitted under Rule 9 of the Committee’s Rules (see documents DH-DD(2012)292 and DH-DD(2013)1075 );   Noting that, in July 2003 by Law No. 4928, the restriction on an accused’s right of access to a lawyer in proceedings before the State Security Court was lifted; and that, in July 2005, a new Code of Criminal Procedure entered into force, granting all detained persons the right of access to a lawyer from the moment they are taken into police custody and making the appointment of a lawyer obligatory in respect of minors or persons accused of an offence punishable by a maximum of at least five years’ imprisonment;   Further noting that, in October 2016, additional amendments were made to the Code of Criminal Procedure, providing that, by a court order, the right of access to a lawyer can be restricted during the first 24 hours of police custody in respect of an exhaustive list of crimes, including crimes relating to national security, terrorism and organised drug trafficking, but that suspects cannot be interrogated while denied access to a lawyer during this period and that there is therefore no possibility of statements made while denied legal assistance being admitted in evidence against them, and that this is the law currently in force;   Recalling further that in some of these cases the Court found other violations, but that general measures in respect of these violations have been or are being examined by the Committee in the context of other groups of cases, namely: (1) Measures in relation to excessive length of proceedings and introducing an effective remedy in this respect were taken within the framework of the Ormanci and Others group of cases (see CM/ResDH(2014)298 ); (2) Measures in relation to the State Security Courts were taken within the framework of the cases of Sertkaya ( CM/ResDH(2008)83 ), Çıraklar ( DH(99)555 ) and the Gençel group ( CM/ResDH(2013)256 ); (3) Measures relating to the failure to communicate prosecutors’ opinions in proceedings before the Court of Cassation were taken within the framework of the Göç group of cases (see CM/ResDH(2011)307 ); (4) Measures envisaged in respect of the right to the presumption of innocence are being examined by the Committee within the context of the Dicle and Sadak case (Application No. 48621/07); (5) Measures envisaged in respect of the right to examine or have examined witnesses against one are being examined by the Committee within the context of Orhan Çaçan group (No. 26437/04); (6) Measures aimed at preventing excessive length of pre-trial detention, lack of sufficient reasons to justify it, lack of an effective remedy to challenge its lawfulness and lack of the right to compensation in respect of unlawful pre-trial detention were taken within the framework of the Demirel group of cases (see CM/ResDH(2016)332 ); (7) Measures aimed at preventing excessive length of police custody were taken within the framework of the Murat Satık and Others group (see ResDH(2005)75); (8) Measures relating to the failure promptly to inform individuals about the reasons for their arrests were taken within the framework of the Avcı (Cabat) and Others group (see CM/ResDH(2009)96 ); (9) Measures to prevent similar violations of freedom of expression are being examined by the Committee within the context of Incal group of cases (Application No. 22678/93);   Recalling that the applications in these cases referred to arrests which occurred prior to 2003, during the period when section 31 of Law No. 3842 was in force, and that the Committee of Ministers’ decisions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention are entirely without prejudice to the Court’s consideration of any future cases lodged before it;   Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof. Appendix: List of cases   Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 36391/02 SALDUZ 27/11/2008 Grand Chamber 10324/05 İZZET ÖZCAN 28/07/2009 28/10/2009 11/05 GÜRBÜZ AND ÖZÇELİK 02/02/2016 02/02/2016 11022/05 HİKMET YILMAZ 04/06/2013 04/09/2013 11368/04 DAŞ 01/09/2015 01/09/2015 1236/09 YAŞAR AND OTHERS 28/11/2017 28/11/2017 12550/03 ÇİMEN IŞIK 16/07/2009 16/10/2009 12838/05 CAHIT AYDIN 11/01/2011 11/01/2011 12976/05 KARADAĞ 29/06/2010 29/09/2010 13304/03 SAVGIN 02/02/2010 02/05/2010 13885/05 SÜZER 23/04/2013 23/07/2013 13918/03 OĞRAŞ 13/10/2009 13/01/2010 15065/07 ARAS (No. 2) 18/11/2014 18/02/2015 15737/02 ÖNGÜN 23/06/2009 23/09/2009 16500/04 İBRAHIM ÖZTÜRK 17/02/2009 17/05/2009 16943/03 TAŞÇIGIL 03/03/2009 03/06/2009 17252/09 SAPAN 20/09/2011 20/09/2011 17730/07 FIDANCI 17/01/2012 04/06/2012 18532/05 FATMA TUNÇ (No. 2) 13/10/2009 13/01/2010 1915/03 ARZU 15/09/2009 15/12/2009 1942/08 İBRAHİM GÜLER 15/10/2013 17/02/2014 19582/02 ÇIMEN 03/02/2009 03/05/2009 19914/03 GÜLÇER AND ASLIM 16/06/2009 16/09/2009 2039/04 BOZ 09/02/2010 09/05/2010 20406/05 MEHMET ALİ AYHAN 03/11/2009 03/02/2010 20564/10 İRMAK 12/01/2016 12/04/2016 2091/07 HAYRETTIN DEMIR 24/07/2012 24/07/2012 22088/03 GÜROVA 06/10/2009 06/01/2010 22182/10 SEYFETTİN GÜNEŞ 17/11/2015 17/02/2016 22493/07 DAVUT ABO 26/11/2013 26/11/2013 22922/03 HALİL KAYA 22/09/2009 22/12/2009 23501/07 AHMET ERYILMAZ 03/06/2014 03/09/2014 23904/03 GÜLECAN 28/04/2009 28/07/2009 24739/04 AHMET ARSLAN 22/09/2009 22/12/2009 24820/05 FAZLI KAYA 17/09/2013 17/12/2013 24829/03 FİKRET ÇETİN 13/10/2009 13/01/2010 25301/04 ADALMIŞ AND KILIÇ 01/12/2009 01/03/2010 27303/09 ŞAHİN 12/12/2017 12/12/2017 27335/04 NEVRUZ BOZKURT 01/03/2011 01/06/2011 28439/03 HAKAN DUMAN 23/03/2010 23/06/2010 28451/08 ÇARKÇI No .2 14/10/2014 14/01/2015 2910/04 ÇELEBI AND OTHERS 22/09/2009 22/12/2009 29724/08 ŞİRAY 11/02/2014 11/05/2014 3042/05 KONAK 03/09/2013 03/12/2013 31535/04 BAYRAM GÜÇLÜ 18/02/2014 18/05/2014 31721/02 DEMIRKAYA 13/10/2009 13/01/2010 32705/02 ATTI AND TEDIK 20/10/2009 20/01/2010 33102/04 AYHAN IŞIK 30/03/2010 30/06/2010 33735/02 ÜMIT AYDIN 05/01/2010 05/04/2010 35292/05 SAMAN 05/04/2011 05/07/2011 35392/04 BOLUKOÇ AND OTHERS 10/11/2009 10/02/2010 36001/06 GALİP DOĞRU 28/04/2015 28/07/2015 36838/03 GÜLABI ASLAN 16/06/2009 16/09/2009 3790/09 DÜLEK 18/02/2014 18/02/2014 38114/03 MEHMET ZEKİ DOĞAN 06/10/2009 06/01/2010 38907/09 BAYRAM KOÇ 05/09/2017 05/12/2017 38940/02+ ASLAN AND DEMIR 17/02/2009 17/05/2009 43422/02 BİLGİN AND BULGA 16/06/2009 16/09/2009 44767/06 YILMAZ DEMİR 15/10/2013 15/01/2014 45084/04 ÖMER BERBER 26/01/2010 26/04/2010 4661/02 ŞÜKRAN YILDIZ 03/02/2009 03/05/2009 47079/06 GÜNEŞ 28/11/2017 28/11/2017 47368/99 SOYKAN 21/04/2009 21/07/2009 47695/09 GOLUNC 20/09/2011 20/09/2011 4977/04 ÇOBAN (No. 2) 26/01/2010 26/04/2010 50356/08 MEHMET ŞERIF ÖNER 13/09/2011 13/12/2011 5138/04 AMUTGAN 03/02/2009 03/05/2009 5243/03 GÜRSEL ÇELIK 05/05/2009 05/08/2009 5256/02 KARABİL 16/06/2009 16/09/2009 5289/06 HÜSEYİN HABİP TAŞKIN 01/02/2011 01/05/2011 59653/00 ERASLAN AND OTHERS 06/10/2009 06/01/2010 59780/00 YEŞILKAYA 08/12/2009 08/03/2010 6058/02 EK AND ŞIKTAŞ 17/02/2009 17/05/2009 60683/00 KENAN ENGİN 08/12/2009 08/03/2010 6094/03 ELÇIÇEK AND OTHERS 16/07/2009 16/10/2009 6318/02 ZEKİ BAYHAN 28/07/2009 28/10/2009 63315/00 MUSA KARATAŞ 05/01/2010 05/04/2010 69006/01 DITABAN 14/04/2009 14/07/2009 71864/01 TAĞAÇ AND OTHERS 07/07/2009 07/10/2009 7377/03 DAYANAN 13/10/2009 13/01/2010 7638/02 ABA 03/03/2009 03/06/2009 8180/04 BARAN İHSAN (No. 1) 15/09/2009 15/12/2009 8747/02+ GEÇGEL AND ÇELİK 13/10/2009 13/01/2010 9762/03 SAVAŞ 08/12/2009 08/03/2010