CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 17 mai 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .sDE9D4080 { width:117.08%; margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s4B6F76B7 { width:5.98%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .s2D625803 { width:34.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF4DEC127 { width:17.2%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s6C72ECEF { width:15.98%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s81B43983 { width:26.42%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s30C1964 { width:5.98%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s3FA4A79A { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sE74C84FB { width:20.99pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sB7C66F9A { width:34.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s29A57CA7 { width:17.2%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s32CC572B { width:15.98%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF4CBCAAC { width:26.42%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Communicated on 17 May 2018   FIRST SECTION Application no. 30742/07 Rosaria IMPELLIZZERI and others against Italy lodged on 9 July 2007 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The case concerns the expropriation of the applicants’ land and the calculation of the expropriation compensation due to them in accordance with Article 5 bis of Law No. 359 of 1992 and Article 16 of Law No. 865 of 1971. Pursuant to the latter provisions, the applicants’ land had been classified as agricultural and they were awarded compensation reflecting the “average agricultural value” ( valore agricolo medio ) criterion. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Have the applicants been deprived of their property in accordance with the requirements of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1? In particular, did the deprivation of property impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants on account of the amount awarded to them as expropriation compensation (see Preite v. Italy , no. 28976/05, 17 November 2015)?   LIST OF APPLICANTS N o . Firstname LASTNAME Birth year Nationality Place of residence                 Rosaria IMPELLIZZERI 1945 Italian CALTAGIRONE                 Carmelinda CANNATA 1972 Italian CALTAGIRONE                 Giuseppe CANNATA 1984 Italian CALTAGIRONE                 Orazio Riccardo CANNATA 1970 Italian CALTAGIRONE                 Vincenzo CANNATA 1965 Italian CALTAGIRONE                 Agata IMPELLIZZERI 1947 Italian CALTAGIRONE