CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 14 mai 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 14 May 2018   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 44078/14 Tibor TÖRÖK against Hungary lodged on 2 August 2014 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the applicant’s inability to have his child access rights enforced for over four years. He invokes Article 5 of Protocol No.   7. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicant’s right to respect for his family life, within the meaning of Article   8 §   1 of the Convention (see Ónodi v. Hungary , no. 38647/09, 30 May 2017)?