CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 6 avril 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-182704
- Date
- 6 avril 2018
- Publication
- 6 avril 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .sA4065904 { width:7.06%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .s7A79B75C { width:24.8%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s87633CC0 { width:10.74%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sFA29F848 { width:14.98%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF9B3AFBF { width:18.7%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sBB147DB { width:23.72%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s8E745F0A { width:7.06%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s3FA4A79A { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold; list-style-position:inside } .sE74C84FB { width:20.99pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sB871DC3C { width:24.8%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD5F37F0E { width:10.74%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2636E1DF { width:14.98%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2432F201 { width:18.7%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s1558D2D3 { width:23.72%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4EFEAD { width:14.32pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block }   Communicated on 6 April 2018   SECOND SECTION Application no. 51893/09 Dürdane KÜÇÜK and others against Turkey lodged on 17 September 2009 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the substantial amount of lawyer’s fees imposed on the applicants by the domestic court as a result of a case they had brought for additional expropriation compensation. The applicants complain of a violation of their right under Article 1 of Protocol   No.   1 to the Convention, arguing that the lawyer’s fees they had to pay were not proportionate to the compensation awarded to them. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicants’ right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions? In particular, did the fact that the applicants were ordered to pay lawyer’s fees to the expropriating public authority constitute an excessive burden which upset the fair balance which must be struck between the general interest of the community and the fundamental rights of the individual (see, mutatis mutandis , Perdigão v. Portugal [GC], no.   24768/06, §§ 67-78, 16 November 2010)? APPENDIX N o . Firstname LASTNAME Birth year Nationality Place of residence Representative                 Dürdane KÜÇÜK 1933 Turkish ADANA Ö. Yıldız                 Hasan BAĞIŞ 1960 Turkish ADANA Ö. Yıldız                 Sabriye CANBOLAT 1951 Turkish ADANA Ö. Yıldız                 Burhan CANPOLAT 1955 Turkish ADANA Ö. Yıldız                 Semahat CANPOLAT 1959 Turkish ADANA Ö. Yıldız                 Haney GÜNEŞ 1937 Turkish ADANA Ö. Yıldız                 İlyas GÜNEŞ 1963 Turkish ADANA Ö. Yıldız                 Elif KARACAN 1965 Turkish ADANA Ö. Yıldız                 Meryem KARACAN 1961 Turkish ADANA Ö. Yıldız             İbrahim KÜÇÜK 1929 Turkish ADANA Ö. Yıldız             Eyyüp ŞAHİN 1958 Turkish ADANA Ö. Yıldız  Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 6 avril 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-182704
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel