CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 avril 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-182688
- Date
- 4 avril 2018
- Publication
- 4 avril 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s6DB91820 { text-align:center } .s8BB62139 { margin-right:auto; margin-left:auto; border-collapse:collapse } .s3695F815 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sE8934522 { border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s8F670191 { font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; list-style-position:inside } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold }   Communicated on 4 April 2018   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 64606/16 Ilham AHMADOV against Azerbaijan and 3 other applications (see list appended) SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern annulment of the applicants’ title to a plot of land and the non-residential premises on that plot of land, which they had obtained as bona fide buyers, upon the claim of the Ministry of Defence on the ground that the privatisation of the property in question ten years earlier and its subsequent transfer to the applicants had allegedly been unlawful. The applicants were not paid compensation. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Were the applicants deprived of their possessions in the public interest, and in accordance with the conditions provided for by law, within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention? In particular, were the applicants bona fide buyers? What were the requirements of the domestic law in respect of annulment of the title in case of bona fide buyers? Did the annulment of title without any compensation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy , [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V)?   2.     Did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations in the proceedings concerning the alleged violation of their property rights, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the principle of legal certainty respected with regard to the admission of the claim of the Ministry of Defence?   Was the claim of the Ministry of Defence lodged within the statutory time-limit? When did the Ministry of Defence first become aware of the privatisation of the property in question? APPENDIX   No. Application no. Lodged on Applicant Date of birth Place of residence Nationality Represented by   64606/16 04/11/2016 Ilham AHMADOV 1967 Baku Azerbaijani Agil LAYIJOV   64916/16 05/11/2016 Gahraman GAFAROV 1968 Baku Azerbaijani Agil LAYIJOV   64929/16 05/11/2016 Gunduz TAHIRLI 1970 Baku Azerbaijani Agil LAYIJOV   64940/16 05/11/2016 Namig BAHADUR 1982 Baku Azerbaijani Agil LAYIJOV    Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 4 avril 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-182688
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel