CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 15 mars 2018

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s2007D3CB { width:100%; border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .sA7145EEB { width:16.68%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s1B58A270 { width:31.82%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD337A76A { width:27.26%; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD6D1A8E9 { width:24.24%; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sCC5122F2 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD7287D91 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:9pt } .s9338A2FF { width:16.68%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s42AD2C76 { width:31.82%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5C3F9BAB { width:27.26%; border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sCBF1BFE6 { width:24.24%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sDAD54742 { width:16.68%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF7E64F3A { width:31.82%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF7FAE8E4 { width:27.26%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s957E3948 { width:24.24%; border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .s3985515B { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sCCB68666 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:36pt; text-align:justify } Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)110 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights 24 cases against Ukraine   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 March 2018 at the 1310 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application Case Judgment of Final on NEVMERZHITSKY GROUP 72277/01 DVOYNYKH 12/10/2006 12/02/2007 23136/04 IZZETOV 15/09/2011 15/12/2011 25209/06 GORBATENKO 28/11/2013 28/02/2014 65550/01 KOVAL 19/10/2006 12/02/2007 28969/04 SAMOYLOVICH 16/05/2013 16/08/2013 32362/02 VISLOGUZOV 20/05/2010 20/08/2010 63763/11 ZINCHENKO 13/03/2014 13/06/2014 37538/05 ZNAYKIN 07/10/2010 07/01/2011 YAKOVENKO GROUP 9607/06 BARILO 16/05/2013 16/08/2013 43707/07 KOKTYSH 10/12/2009 10/03/2010 36433/05 MUSTAFAYEV 13/10/2011 13/01/2012 35581/06 POKHLEBIN 20/05/2010 20/08/2010 19213/04 TSYGONIY 24/11/2011 24/02/2012 30634/05 VENIOSOV 15/12/2011 15/03/2012 LOGVINENKO GROUP 5203/09 KONDRATYEV 15/12/2011 15/03/2012 42184/09 KUSHNIR 11/12/2014 11/03/2015 9414/13 SOKIL 22/10/2014 22/01/2016 29070/15 PIVOVARNIK 06/10/2016 06/01/2017 ISAYEV GROUP 75522/01 MIKHANIV 06/11/2008 6/04/2009 30628/02 UKHAN 18/12/2008 18/03/2009 49218/10 YERMOLENKO 15/11/2012 15/02/2013 30579/10 TEMCHENKO 16/07/2015 16/10/2015 53865/11 KUSHCH 03/12/2015 03/03/2016 MELNIK GROUP 16995/05 GUK 08/12/2016 08/12/2016   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established, mainly on account of poor conditions of detention and inadequate access to medical care in police holding facilities, pre-trial detention centres and penitentiary establishments, and the lack of effective remedies in both respects (violations of Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required: -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the information provided by the government indicating the individual measures adopted to give effect to the judgments, including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see documents DH-DD(2017)410 and DH-DD(2018)32 );   Considering that the question of individual measures has therefore been resolved in these cases, given that the applicants have been released and that all required individual measures have also been taken in respect of the other violations found by the Court;   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to all the shortcomings found by the Court in these judgments continues to be examined within the framework of the Nevmerzhitsky groups of cases and that the closure of these cases therefore in no way prejudges the Committee’s evaluation of the general measures in relation to poor conditions of detention and inadequate access to medical care in police holding facilities, pre-trial detention centres and penitentiary establishments and the lack of effective remedies as well as the other issues in these cases;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases as regards the individual measures and   DECIDES to close the examination of these cases.