CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 15 mars 2018

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s88A4DB4E { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sDD8F0D07 { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .s6A269875 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:middle } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s5A722CD { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.45pt; margin-bottom:0pt } Interim Resolution CM/ResDH(2018)106 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Gazsó group v. Hungary   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 March 2018 at the 1310 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application Case Judgment of Final on 48322/12 GAZSÓ 16/07/2015 16/10/2015 25065/09 DÖMÖTÖR 22/10/2013 22/10/2013 33795/08 MAGYAR CEMENT KFT 28/05/2013 28/05/2013 25411/10 NÉMETH 17/02/2015 17/02/2015 5766/05 SCHWARTZ AND OTHERS 03/11/2009 01/12/2009 19478/03 TARDI AND OTHERS 23/10/2007 23/01/2008 36630/11 BALOGH 09/02/2016 09/02/2016 7952/12+ JENEI AND OTHERS 20/10/2016 20/10/2016 29143/09 KARACS 15/12/2015 15/12/2015 236/12 KÉZDISZENTKERESZTI BÍRÓ 18/10/2016 18/10/2016 60670/11+ KHARON KFT AND FREHA 20/10/2016 20/10/2016 31956/13 LAKICS 18/07/2017 18/07/2017 6018/12+ MÁTHÉ AND SZABÓ 20/10/2016 20/10/2016 76928/11 MÁTYUS 04/10/2016 04/10/2016 20264/12 RÁCZ 18/10/2016 18/10/2016 2240/12+ SZEBELLÉDI AND OTHERS AND 2 OTHER APPLICATIONS 20/10/2016 20/10/2016 43355/11 TEMESFŐI AND OTHERS 18/10/2016 18/10/2016 42329/09 VARGA 22/03/2016 22/03/2016   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the considerable number of judgments of the Court finding violations of Article 6, paragraph 1, and in some of these judgments also violations of Article 13 of the Convention, due to the excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect in Hungary;   Recalling that the first case of this kind became final in 2003 and the problem has thus persisted for over 14   years, and that in view of the scale of the problem the Court delivered a pilot judgment in the case of Gazsó which set 16 October 2016 as deadline for the introduction of “an effective domestic remedy or combination of such remedies”;   Recalling that excessive delays in the administration of justice constitute a serious danger for the respect of the rule of law, resulting in a denial of rights enshrined in the Convention;   Reiterating the additional undue burden on the Court due to the high number of similar cases pending (approximately 1,000) and the new similar applications that are being lodged with the Court, and the serious threat to the effectiveness of the Convention system arising from the failure to abide by the obligations deriving from a pilot judgment;   Expressing grave concern that, despite the Committee’s repeated calls, and contrary to the authorities’ own previous indications, almost one and a half years after the expiry of the deadline set by the Court no tangible progress has been achieved as regards the introduction of an effective domestic remedy or combination of such remedies addressing the issue of excessively lengthy court proceedings;   Noting that the Hungarian authorities have informed the Committee of their intention to introduce a compensatory remedy for excessively lengthy court proceedings by 31 October 2018 and recalling that by then the deadline set by the Court will have expired more than two years previously;   CALLED UPON the Hungarian authorities to redouble their efforts to ensure that the legislative process envisaged for the introduction of a compensatory remedy for excessively lengthy court proceedings is completed in line with the new timetable presented, i.e. by 31 October 2018;   INVITED the authorities to submit the details of their new timetable by 30 April 2018, at the latest, and to keep the Committee of Ministers informed, on a monthly basis, about all relevant developments in the legislative process so as to allow for continuous monitoring of the progress achieved and the steps taken to respect the new timetable;   DECIDED to resume examination of this item, in the light of the information received from the authorities, at one of its next Human Rights meetings and at the latest, at its 1331st meeting (December 2018) (DH).