CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 12 février 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s3136A51 { width:98.74%; border-collapse:collapse } .s690CF2DB { width:10.92%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s598389F9 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .sA1D40300 { width:32.22%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s50B71B04 { width:13.26%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s23B5BB27 { width:20.84%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s95AF1670 { width:22.74%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sABCAD4A7 { width:10.92%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sA9525B0D { margin-left:33.01pt; text-align:center; padding-left:2.99pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s385262C1 { width:32.22%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sA447382 { width:13.26%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .sC1F82D28 { width:20.84%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s994F3782 { width:22.74%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s74925A98 { margin-left:36pt; text-align:center; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold }   Communicated on 12 February 2018   SECOND SECTION Application no. 18541/11 Fadim AKBIYIK and others against Turkey lodged on 21 December 2010 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the impossibility for the applicants, due to the application of a time-limit, to recover a plot of land which, according to a court decision, was wrongfully registered as belonging to the Treasury. The applicants complain of a violation of their right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol   No. 1 to the Convention. They further complain of a breach of their right to access to court within the meaning of Article 6 of the Convention. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the impossibility to recover the property which, according to the court decision rendered in 1980, was wrongfully registered as belonging to the Treasury, deprive the applicants of their possessions within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention? If so, did that deprivation impose an excessive burden on the applicants (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR   1999 ‑ V).Furthermore, did the proceedings at issue afford the applicants a reasonable opportunity of putting their cases to the relevant authorities for the purpose of effectively challenging the measures interfering with the rights guaranteed by Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 of the Convention ( Société Anonyme Thaleia Karydi Axte v. Greece , no. 44769/07, §§ 36-38, 5   November 2009?   2.     Did the rejection of the applicants’ case due to the time-limit constitute a violation of their right of access to court within the meaning of Article 6 of the Convention? In this context, was the application of this time-limit foreseeable?         N o . Firstname LASTNAME Birth year Nationality Place of residence   Fadim AKBIYIK 1931 Turkish DENİZLİ   Ayşe METE 1954 Turkish DENİZLİ   Mehmet Salih TÜRKEŞ 1948 Turkish DENİZLİ   Abdullah VARDAL 1950 Turkish DENİZLİ   Ali Rıza VARDAL 1956 Turkish DENİZLİ   Orhan VARDAL 1962 Turkish DENİZLİ   Abdullah YAVAŞ 1941 Turkish DENİZLİ   Ali Rıza YAVAŞ 1938 Turkish DENİZLİ   Ayşe YAVAŞ 1945 Turkish DENİZLİ   Fatma YAVAŞ 1927 Turkish DENİZLİ   Hediye YAVAŞ 1964 Turkish DENİZLİ   Hüseyin YAVAŞ 1944 Turkish DENİZLİ   Mehmet YAVAŞ 1926 Turkish DENİZLİ   Önder YAVAŞ 1962 Turkish DENİZLİ