CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 24 janvier 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }   Communicated on 14 December 2016 and 24 January 2018   THIRD SECTION Application no. 30423/16 Aleksandr Nikolayevich DUBOVETS against Russia lodged on 25 May 2016   The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTIONS 1.     The parties are requested to inform the Court of the developments in the applicant’s case, if any, following Ruling No.   15-P delivered by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on 22   June 2017 (Постановление от 22 июня 2017 года N 16-П «По делу о проверке конституционности положения пункта 1 статьи 302 Гражданского Кодекса Российской Федерации в связи с жалобой гражданина А.Н.   Дубовца»). In the event of a delivery of a new judgment in the applicant’s case by the courts of general jurisdiction, the parties are requested to provide the relevant documents.   2.     Regard being had to the developments in the applicant’s case following the delivery of the Constitutional Court’s ruling of 22   June 2017, can the applicant still claim to be a victim of a violation of the Convention, within the meaning of Article   34?