CEDHCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 19 janvier 2018
- ECLI
- ECLI:CEDH:001-180735
- Date
- 19 janvier 2018
- Publication
- 19 janvier 2018
droits fondamentauxCEDH
Source : DILA / Judilibre · open data
Mes notes
privées · visibles par vous seulRésumé structuré
version préliminaireFaits
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Procédure
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Question juridique
Non déterminable à partir du texte fourni.
Solution
source officielleCommunicated
Résumé généré automatiquement — à vérifier avec la décision originale.
Analyse IA non disponible
Générez un résumé intelligent de cette décision
Texte intégral
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic }   Communicated on 19 January 2018   SECOND SECTION Application no. 42875/13 Fatmir GJANCI against Albania lodged on 9 June 2013 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns civil proceedings before the Supreme Court held in the absence of the applicant. It appears that the summons for the Supreme Court hearing of 13 September 2011 was published on the notice board only. The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the fact that he was not personally notified of the Supreme Court hearing amounted to a hindrance of his right of access to court and that, as a result, the principles of equality of arms and adversarial proceedings were not respected. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.     Did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of his civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, were the principles of equality of arms and adversarial proceedings, as well as the right to be present at the hearing, respected as regards the examination of the case by the Supreme Court without the applicant’s participation? Was the applicant’s right of access to court breached, on account of his inability to challenge the decision taken in his absence (see for example Gakharia v. Georgia , no. 30459/13, § 44, 17   January 2017)?Citations
Aucune citation répertoriée pour cette décision.
Décisions connexes
Aucune décision similaire identifiée pour le moment.
Synthèse
- Juridiction
- CEDH
- Chambre
- CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
- Date
- 19 janvier 2018
- Matière
- droits fondamentaux
Référence
ECLI:CEDH:001-180735
Données disponibles
- Texte intégral
- Résumé officiel