CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 4 janvier 2018

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s3136A51 { width:98.74%; border-collapse:collapse } .s65A795E5 { width:9.02%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EF62ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:12pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD35D798C { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; font-weight:bold; vertical-align:super; color:#474747 } .s638752E5 { width:24.64%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s5323E288 { width:13.26%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s9D7E781C { width:26.56%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF19D9177 { width:26.52%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s355B2C82 { width:9.02%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s4EAB073 { margin-left:22.11pt; padding-left:2.99pt; font-family:Arial; font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .sC2AEB616 { width:24.64%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sAA30D3C2 { width:13.26%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sA5F721B2 { width:26.56%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB10BBD93 { width:26.52%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Communicated on 4 January 2018     FOURTH SECTION Application no. 609/14 Gábor SCHEIRING and Rebeka Katalin SZABÓ against Hungary lodged on 20 December 2013 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application essentially concerns the obligation of the applicants, opposition Members of Parliament, to pay a fine imposed on them by Parliament on the Speaker’s proposal on 12   December 2013 for their behaviour seriously disrupting the proceedings of a parliamentary session. QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Has there been an interference with the applicants’ freedom of expression within the meaning of Article   10 §   1 of the Convention, in particular having regard to their role as elected Members of Parliament in participating in debates of public interest and scrutinising decisions of the Government (see Karácsony and Others v.   Hungary [GC], nos.   42461/13 and 44357/13, ECHR 2016 (extracts))?               N o . Firstname LASTNAME Birth year Place of residence Representative   Gábor SCHEIRING 1981 Budapest   Dániel   Karsai   Rebeka Katalin SZABÓ 1977 Budapest   Dániel   Karsai