CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 20 février 2017

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA8776625 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .s72C8F48C { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:36.6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:-15.05pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s77BBF59F { width:138.5%; border-collapse:collapse } .s8235E78A { height:14.2pt } .sB942DEF6 { width:5.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s2EB42ED2 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } .sEECE831 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; color:#474747 } .sD073157D { width:36.5%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s31C34EAA { width:13.52%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s63CB6D7 { width:18.92%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s16E87392 { width:12.2%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF6AA50AA { width:13.46%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sC756A51C { width:5.4%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s6B505E72 { margin:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .s901B8D2A { font-family:Arial; font-size:10pt; list-style-position:inside } .s38F34D94 { width:22.66pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s265909BF { width:36.5%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s1C0B717F { width:13.52%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD7ECC7F1 { width:18.92%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sD7C56B40 { width:12.2%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s804D3747 { width:13.46%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s85226119 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .sEAC9682F { width:17.1pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .s28F5597F { margin-top:18pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .sDA7B726A { width:116.04%; border-collapse:collapse } .s9DD34CD6 { height:17pt } .s24DA8339 { width:6.46%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sE95D24D8 { width:41.94%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s3A113B6B { width:16.18%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .s9EA45D88 { width:20.94%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sF829F1AC { width:14.5%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#dfdfdf } .sEF7374D2 { width:6.46%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s95311B55 { width:41.94%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s24A84A3E { width:16.18%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s153C3890 { width:20.94%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s1299F2BC { width:14.5%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top }   Communicated on 20 February 2017   THIRD SECTION Application no. 4915/06 Fedor Alekseyevich KIRSANOV and others against Russia lodged on 29 December 2005 STATEMENT OF FACTS 1.     The applicants are Russian nationals whose names and dates of birth are tabulated below. They live in Kurgan. They are represented before the Court by Ms S.R.   Mukhambetova, a lawyer practising in Yekaterinburg. A.     The circumstances of the case 2.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.     Non-enforcement of final judgments in twenty applicants’ favour 3.     Twenty applicants obtained monetary court awards against Federal State Unitary enterprise “Kurganpribor” ( ФГУП «Курганприбор» ) (hereafter “the company”), as tabulated in Appendix I below. In January 2004 insolvency proceedings started in respect of the company. 4.     On 31   March 2005, the applicants complained to domestic courts about the liquidator’s acts. On 11   May 2005 the Commercial Court of the Kurgan Region declared the liquidator’s acts lawful. The applicants appealed. On 28 July 2005 the Commercial Court of the Kurgan Region discontinued the proceedings on the ground that the enterprise had already been liquidated and that on 27   June 2005 its name had been deleted from the Uniform State Register of Legal Entities ( Единый государственный реестр юридических лиц ). 5.     The applicants maintain that they learnt about the company’s liquidation on 28   July 2005 in the course of the proceedings related to their complaint about the liquidator’s acts. 6.     According to the applicants, the court awards in their favour have not been fully enforced to date. 2.     Proceedings related to sixteen applicants’ pensions 7.     Sixteen applicants sued the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation ( Пенсионный фонд Российской Федерации) (hereafter – the Fund) for having failed to pay them pensions in respect of the years 2002-2005. 8.     On the dates tabulated in Appendix II below domestic courts dismissed the applicants’ claims on the ground that the Pension Fund had received no contributions in respect of the relevant period and, accordingly, the calculation of the pensions’ amounts by the Fund had been accurate. B.     Relevant domestic law 9.     Article 10 § 1 of Federal Law no.   173-FZ of 17   December 2001 stipulates that the aggregate duration of work periods taken into consideration for the purposes of calculation of pension amount includes periods of work or other activity, provided that contributions were paid to the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation in respect of those periods. 10.     Article 28   §   3 of Federal Law no.   127-FZ of 26   October 2002 “On insolvency (bankruptcy)”, as in force at the material time, provides that decisions of discontinuation of insolvency proceedings shall be published. Article   57 §   1 of the same law stipulates that a commercial court discontinues the insolvency proceedings when the liquidation proceedings (конкурсное производство) are closed. COMPLAINTS Relying on Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, twenty applicants complain about non-enforcement of court awards in their favour. Relying on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, sixteen applicants complain about the refusal to pay them pensions in respect of 2002-2005.   QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.     Has there been a violation of the sixteen applicants’ right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions, following the refusal to pay them pensions in respect of 2002-2005 ( Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, §   64, ECHR 2010)? In particular, has there been an interference with the applicants’ right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions following that refusal? If so, has the interference been in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law?   2.     Has the complaint regarding the non-enforcement of the final judgments in the twenty applicants’ favour been introduced within six months, as required by Article   35   §   1 of the Convention? In particular, was the decision to discontinue the insolvency proceedings published, in accordance with Article   28   §   3 and Article   57   §   1 of Federal Law no.   127 ‑ FZ of 26   October 2002 “On insolvency (bankruptcy)”? If so, when and where? Were the applicants informed of that decision by any other means?     Appendix   No. Applicant’s name Date of birth Judgment by Date of the judgment, in force on Amount awarded, date of enforcement (if enforced)                   Fedor Alekseyevich KIRSANOV 22/02/1942 Kurgan City Court of the Kurgan Region 21/08/2001, in force on 01/09/2001 EUR 1,522 partly enforced Justice of the Peace of the 44th Court Circuit of the city of Kurgan of the Kurgan Region 09/03/2004, in force on 29/03/2004   EUR 1,902 not enforced                   Galina Georgiyevna ALEKSANDROVA 16/05/1947 Justice of the Peace of the 44th Court Circuit of the city of Kurgan of the Kurgan Region   28/04/2005, in force on 12/05/2005   EUR 130                   Margarita Vladimirovna ARTYUSHKINA 15/11/1951 EUR 108                   Galina Viktorovna BUZMAKOVA 13/12/1957 EUR 133                   Svetlana Ivanovna CHEREPANOVA 20/08/1946 EUR 203                   Vladimir Georgiyevich FOMIN 30/11/1944 EUR 191                   Rozaliya Abrarovna GOMZYAKOVA 29/12/1942 EUR 154                   Tamara Nikolayevna GONTSOVA 04/06/1949 EUR 153                   Zinaida Fedorovna KUKSILOVA 05/11/1946 EUR 137               Nadezhda Vladimirovna KULTYSHEVA 22/11/1950 EUR 135               Aleksandr Stepanovich KUTYGIN 14/12/1938 EUR 153               Tatyana Pavlovna NASONOVA 12/07/1951 EUR 176               Boris Stepanovich NECHAYEV 07/05/1939 EUR 130               Lyudmila Nikolayevna PERSHUKOVA 14/09/1951 EUR 97               Valentina Prokhorovna RYBINA 29/09/1946 EUR 65               Nina Maksimovna RYZHIKH 15/01/1946 EUR 228               Nadezhda Andreyevna SAFONOVA 17/02/1951 EUR 152               Vladimir Nikolayevich SHASHIN 12/03/1944 EUR 217               Zhanna Nikolayevna TSVETKOVA 15/04/1938 EUR 164               Nadezhda Vasilyevna ULYANOVA 24/01/1949 EUR 123 APPENDIX II   No. Applicant’s name Date of birth Judgment by Date of the judgment, in force on                   Lyubov Mikhaylovna PUGACH 25/04/1947 Kurgan City Court of the Kurgan Region 21/02/2006 18/04/2006                   Aleksandr Feodosyevich PUGACH 12/01/1944                   Nadezhda Vladimirovna KULTYSHEVA 22/11/1950                   Valentina Prokhorovna RYBINA 29/09/1946 Kurgan City Court of the Kurgan Region 26/01/2006 25/04/2006                   Vladimir Nikolayevich SHASHIN 12/03/1944                   Tamara Nikolayevna GONTSOVA 04/06/1949                   Zinaida Fedorovna KUKSILOVA 05/11/1946                   Rozaliya Abrarovna GOMZYAKOVA 29/12/1942                   Zhanna Nikolayevna TSVETKOVA 15/04/1938               Nadezhda Vasilyevna ULYANOVA 24/01/1949 Kurgan City Court of the Kurgan Region 26/01/2006 27/04/2006               Galina Georgiyevna ALEKSANDROVA 16/05/1947               Sergey Vadimovich KUKSILOV 08/05/1949               Galina Yakovlevna LEGOTINA 21/11/1947               Lyudmila Ivanovna KOROTKIKH 15/01/1950               Fedor Alekseyevich KIRSANOV 22/02/1942 Kurgan City Court of the Kurgan Region 02/02/2006 11/04/2006               Vladimir Georgiyevich FOMIN 30/11/1944