CEDH · CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG — 22 février 2017

.s3ABFC313 { font-size:10pt } .sCF71F55 { width:100%; border-collapse:collapse } .s829ABBD9 { border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-top:11.35pt; padding-bottom:10.98pt; vertical-align:middle } .s598389FB { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sDB9EB187 { font-weight:bold } .s3CC4D07E { font-size:12pt; font-weight:bold } .s598389F8 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center; font-size:11pt } .sFBC99493 { font-style:italic } .s2D33099A { font-size:7.33pt; font-style:italic; vertical-align:super } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .sE3D66594 { border:0.75pt solid #000000; border-collapse:collapse } .s41E9DBF5 { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5FFF0A7F { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sF004B676 { border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sC3AB69A { border-style:solid; border-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s2342A031 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s546C9D04 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s40B7A780 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s4F2EDFF { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s22F01CEB { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-18pt } .s37D58556 { width:14.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s876D4AB2 { text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } .sA8507A40 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:35.4pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s74384AE5 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:35.4pt } Resolution CM/ResDH(2017)57 Execution of the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Thirty-four cases against Bulgaria   (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 22 February 2017 at the 1278 th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies)     Application No. Case Judgment of Final on 20484/05 ARABADZHIEV AND ALEXIEV 21/12/2010 21/12/2010 19315/04 ATANASOV 09/12/2010 09/12/2010 30949/04 DELOV 24/02/2011 24/02/2011 36552/03 DIMITROV MAXIM 07/01/2010 07/04/2010 50401/99 DIMITROV VASKO YORDANOV 03/05/2006 03/08/2006 17911/03 F.G 04/03/2010 04/06/2010 32461/02 HRISTOV IVAN 20/03/2008 20/06/2008 67189/01 IVANOV 24/05/2007 12/11/2007 27776/04 IVANOV 25/11/2010 25/11/2010 49163/99 KALPACHKA 02/11/2006 02/02/2007 65051/01 KARAGYOZOV 25/10/2007 25/01/2008 45964/99 KAROV 16/11/2006 26/03/2007 13364/05 KECHEV 26/07/2012 26/07/2012 50326/99 KOLEV 28/04/2005 28/07/2005 21205/04 KOLEV ILIYA 13/01/2011 13/01/2011 33231/04 KONOVSKI 02/09/2010 02/12/2010 30380/03 LISEV 26/02/2009 26/05/2009 43428/02 MYASHEV 08/01/2009 08/04/2009 38106/02 NALBANTOVA 27/09/2007 27/12/2007 44241/98 NEDYALKOV 03/11/2005 03/02/2006 54178/00+ OSMANOV AND YUSEINOV 23/09/2004 23/12/2004 23240/04 RANGELOV AND STEFANOV 01/04/2010 01/07/2010 56337/00 REZOV 15/02/2007 15/05/2007 55057/00 SIDJIMOV 27/01/2005 27/04/2005 58733/00 SODADJIEV 05/10/2006 05/01/2007 25382/04 STEFANOV AND YURUKOV 01/04/2010 01/07/2010 62594/00 TERZIEV 12/04/2007 12/07/2007 72636/01 VALKOV 08/01/2009 08/04/2009 61257/00 VASILEV AND OTHERS 08/11/2007 08/02/2008 27207/04+ YANKOV AND MANCHEV 22/10/2009 22/01/2010 4570/05 YANKOV AND OTHERS 23/09/2010 23/12/2010 70728/01 YANKOV No. 2 07/02/2008 07/05/2008 45563/99 ZHBANOV 22/07/2004 22/10/2004 39143/06 ZHELEV 15/01/2013 15/01/2013   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”),   Having regard to the final judgments transmitted by the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations established, in particular those concerning Article 6 paragraph 1 (excessive length of criminal proceedings due to lengthy periods of inactivity at the pre-trial stage, the repeated remittals of cases to this stage and the failure to appear of witnesses or co-accused) and Article 13 (the lack of effective remedy in this area);   Recalling the respondent State’s obligation, under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention, to abide by all final judgments in cases to which it has been a party and that this obligation entails, over and above the payment of any sums awarded by the Court, the adoption by the authorities of the respondent State, where required:   -           of individual measures to put an end to violations established and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum ; and -           of general measures preventing similar violations;   Having invited the government of the respondent State to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with the above-mentioned obligation;   Having examined the action report provided by the government indicating the measures adopted in order to give effect to the judgments including the information provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2016)1415 );   Noting first the introduction of a combination of domestic compensatory remedies which has been considered as effective by the European Court;   Noting furthermore that the general measures adopted so far have allowed the elimination of delays caused by lengthy periods of inactivity at pre-trial stage;   Noting also that important steps have been made in the execution process as concerns the other identified causes for delay, which are closely linked to the effectiveness of the criminal investigations, and that the authorities have committed themselves to continue their efforts aimed at fully eliminating them in the context of the cases from the S.Z . group which are under the supervision of the Committee;   Noting moreover the commitment of the Bulgarian authorities to speed up the proceedings before the overburdened courts and to put in place an effective acceleratory remedy in criminal matters, in the context of the remaining cases from the Kitov group still under the supervision of the Committee;   Noting finally that the question, raised in the Nedyalkov case, concerning the lack of examination by the first instance court of the existence of a reasonable suspicion that the detainee has committed a criminal offence (violation of Article 5   §   4) is examined in the context of the Bochev group of cases;   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof.