CEDH · CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG — 14 décembre 2016

.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .sFE10DC93 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .sA6BC7FA7 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:right } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s68C46B95 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase }   Communicated on 8 October 2012 and 14 December 2016   SECOND SECTION Application no 56386/10 Ilie ROTARU against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 10 September 2010     The facts and complaints in this application have been summarised in the Court’s Statement of facts and Questions to the parties, which is available in HUDOC. QUESTION Has there been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? In particular, was the principle of “legal certainty”, within the meaning of that provision, breached as a result of the prosecutor’s decision of 26   December 2006 to annul the decisions of 24 October 2005 and 13 December 2005?